法治理论体系建构刍议——以基本内容为视域被引量：1

Comment on the Construction of Rule-by-Law Theoretical System——From the Perspective of Basic Content Modern Neoconfucianism

下载PDF

导出

摘要借助亚里士多德的"四因说",以法治理论的基本内容为视域,可以建构一个相对合理、完备的法治理论体系。就动力因而言,"人治"到"法治"的转化是基于对人性的不信任,直接动因在于防止统治者的恣意。就质料因而言,"恶法"的性质争论远未结束,但追求"良法"是共同愿望,不存在追随"恶法"去作恶的义务。就形式因而言,"形式法治"侧重规范逻辑,"实质法治"侧重道德价值,前者离开后者会变成空洞的形骸,后者离开前者会变成失体的幽灵。就目的因而言,法治既是"治民"又是"治吏",在"法律—官吏—公民"的现代法治结构中,由于官吏身份的特殊性,"治吏"更是法治的核心目的。 Based on Aristotle’s＂four causes＂, a comparatively reasonable, complete rule-by-law theoretical system can be constructed. As for motivation cause, transformation from ＂rule- by- man＂ to＂rule-by-law＂is based on distrust of human nature and direct motivation is to prevent the willfulness of the ruler. As for quality, debate on＂evil law＂does not end but the pursuit of＂good law＂is the common wish which does not carry the duty to follow the＂evil law＂. As for form,＂formal rule-by-law＂emphasizes regulation and logic and ＂essential rule-by-law＂emphasizes moral value with the departure of the former, the latter becoming hollow skeleton and with the departure of the latter, the former formless ghost. As for purpose, rule-by-law is＂ruling civilian＂as well as＂ruling officials＂and in the modern rule-by-law structure of＂law-official-civilian＂, due to the specialty of the identity of the officials,＂ruling the official＂is the core of＂rule-by-law＂.

作者金若山吕世伦

机构地区中国人民大学法学院

出处《求是学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期88-95,共8页 Seeking Truth

关键词法治理论体系人治与法治恶法与良法形式法治与实质法治治民与治吏 rule-by-law theoretical system rule-by-man and rule-by-law evil law and good law formal rule-by-law and essential rule-by-law ruling civilian and ruling officials

分类号 D90 [政治法律—法学理论]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献28

1亚里士多德.《物理学》,张竹明译.北京:商务印书馆,1982年版,第44页.
2青觉,栗献忠.亚里士多德的法治思想及其现代价值[J].国家行政学院学报,2007(5):87-90. 被引量：1
3亚里士多德.《政治学》,吴寿彭译,北京:商务印书馆1965年版,第405,387,415,406页.
4边沁:《政府片论》,北京,商务印书馆,1995.
5奥斯丁:《法理学的范围》,刘星译,北京:中国法制出版社,2002.
6拉德布鲁赫:《法律的不法与超法律的法》,载《法哲学》,王朴译,北京:法律出版,2005.
7H.L.A.Hart.“Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals”,in Harvard Law Review,vol.71,1957(4).
8Jules L.Coleman&Brian Leiter.“Legal Positivism”,in Philosophy of Law,edited by Joel Feinberg and Coleman,London Wadsworth Press,2004.
9查士丁尼.《法学总论--法学阶梯》,北京,商务印书馆,1989.
10洛克:《政府论》(下篇),叶启芳、瞿菊农译,北京:商务印书馆,2003.

二级参考文献102

1H. L.A. Hart, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals, in his Essays In Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1983.
2Joseph Raz, About the Morality and the Nature of Law. 48 American Journal of Jurisprudence 3.2003 .
3John Gardner, Legal Positivism: 5 1/2 Myths. 46 American Journal of Jurisprudence199,2001.
4Leslie Green, "Positivism and the Inseparability of Law and Morals". New York University Law Review, vol. 83,2008.
5Jules Coleman, The Practice of Principle : In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to legal theory. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2001.
6H. L. A, Hart, Law, Liberty, and Morality. Stanford, 1963.
7Larry Alexander & Emily Sherwin, The Rule of Rules : Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law. Durham and London : Duke University Press, 2001.
8H. L. A. Hart, The concept of law. 2nd , Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
9Dworkin, Ronald, Law's Empire. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, 2000.
10Kenneth Einar Himma, "Inclusive Legal Positivism", in The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Jules L. Coleman & Scott Shapiro ed. , Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.