期刊文献+

巨噬细胞移动抑制因子抑制剂对妊娠晚期大鼠急性坏死性胰腺炎胰腺及胎盘损伤的保护作用及量效关系 被引量:4

Dose-effect relationship and protective effect of MIF inhibitor on pancreas and placenta injuries in rats with acute necrotizing pancreatitis in late pregnancy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨巨噬细胞移动抑制因子(MIF)抑制剂ISO一1腹腔注射给药对妊娠晚期大鼠急性坏死性胰腺炎(ANP)大鼠胰腺和胎盘的保护作用及其量效关系。方法SPF级妊娠晚期SD大鼠30只,随机(随机数字法)分为5组(n=6):假手术组(s0组)、ANP组、ISO-1预处理低剂量组(1.75mg/kg,T1组)、中剂量组(3.5mg/kg,T2组)和高剂量组(7.0mg/kg,13组)。胆胰管逆行注射5%牛磺胆酸钠制备ANP模型。预处理组于造模前30rain经腹腔按低、中、高剂量注射溶解IOS-1的10%DMSO(2mL/kg)溶液,SO组、ANP组于造模前30rain经腹腔注射10%DMSO(2mL/kg),术后6h处死大鼠。测定大鼠血清中AMY、LIP、ALT及AST水平,光镜下观察大鼠胰腺、胎盘的组织病理变化。多个样本均数比较采用单因素方差分析,两组间比较采用t检验。结果ANP组AMY、LIP、ALT和AST的水平(U/L)分别为(7101.4±1032.3)、(2939.0±638.8)、(240.34-50.3)和(472.6±27.5),高于SO组的(2268.7±293.8)、(681.1±109.9)、(56.4±15.3)和(110.9015.5),差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);T1组AMY、LIP、ALT、AST的水平(U/L)为(4349.5±439.5)、(1968.9±515.2)、(155.0±41.8)和(373.7±64.9),低于ANP组,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);T2组AMY、LIP、ALT、AST的水平(U/L)为(3459.7±459.2)、(1268.6±367.8)、(110.5±20.6)和(281.8±66.8),低于T1组,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);T3组AMY、LIP、ALT、AST的水平(U/L)为(3288.4±583.7)、(1198.1±328.5)、(100.6±13.2)和(272.9±66.5),同T2组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。ANP组胰腺、胎盘的病理评分分别为(12.3±1.5)分和(6.3±0.8)分,高于SO组(4.7±1.2)分和(0.5±0.5)分,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);T1组胰腺、胎盘病理评分为(10.5±1.6)分和(5.1±0.7)分,低于ANP组,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);T2组胰腺、胎盘病理评分为(8.3±1.0)分和(3.0±0.6)分,低于T1组,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);T3组胰腺、胎盘病理评分为(8.0±1.4)分和(2.8±0.8)分,同12组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论腹腔给予MIF抑制剂ISO-1对妊娠晚期大鼠ANP大鼠胰腺及胎盘具有保护作用,他组(3.5mg/kg)为改善妊娠晚期ANP大鼠胰腺及胎盘损伤安全、有效的最佳剂量。 Objective To eXplore the protective effects and dose-effect relationship of ISO-1, a MIF inhibitor, on pancreatic and placental injuries in rats with acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) in late pregnancy. Methods Thirty SD rats at late pregnancy were randomly (random number) divided into five groups (n = 6 in each group) : sham operation group (SO group), acute necrotizing pancreatitis group (ANP group) and ISO-1 pretreatment group in different dosages : T1 group ( 1.75 mg/kg) , T2 group ( 3.5 mg/kg) and T3 group (7.0 mg/kg). ANP rat model was induced by retrograde injection of 5% sodium tanrocholate into the biliopancreatic duct. In ISO-1 pretreatment group, ISO-1 dissolved in 10% DMSO in different concentration was intra-peritoneal administered. The rats of SO group and ANP group were intra-peritoneal administered with 10%DMSO (2 mL/kg) 30 min before the ANP modeling. Rats were sacrificed 6 hours after modeling. The serum levels of amylase (AMY), lipase (LIP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were detected by biochemical analyzer. Pancreatic and placental pathological changes were evaluated under the optics microscope. All data were analyzed by using the One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or student t test. Results The serum levels (U/L) of AMY, LIP, ALT and AST in ANP group were (7 101.4 ± 1 032. 3) , (2 939.0±638.8), (240. 3 ±50. 3) and (472. 6±27.5), which were significantly higher than (2 268.7 ±293.8), (681.1 ± 109.9), (56.4 ± 15.3) and (110.9 ± 15.5) of SO group (P 〈 0. 05). The levels (U/L) of AMY, LIP, ALT and AST of T1 group were (4 349. 5 ± 439. 5 ) , (1 968.9 ±515.2 ) , ( 155.0 ± 41.8 ) and (373.7 ± 64. 9 ) , which were lower than those of ANP group (P 〈 0. 05 ). The level (U/L) of AMY, LIP, ALT and AST of T2 group were ( 3 459. 7 ± 459. 2 ), ( 1 268.6 ± 367. 8 ), ( 110. 5 ±20. 6) and (281.8 ±66. 8) , which were lower than those of T1 group (P 〈0. 05). The level ( U/ L) of AMY, LIP, ALT and AST of T3 group were (3288.4±583.7), (1 198.1±328.5), (100.6±13.2) and (272. 9 ± 66. 5 ) , which were no significant difference from those of T2 group ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The pancreatic and placental pathological scores of the ANP group were ( 12. 3 ± 1.5) and (6. 3 ±0. 8) , respectively, which were higher than (4.7 ±1.2) and (0.5 ±0.5) of SO group (P 〈0.05). The pancreatic and placental pathological scores of the T1 group were (10. 5±1.6) and (5.1 ±0.7) , respectively, which were lower than those of ANP group ( P 〈 0.05 ). The pancreatic and placental pathological scores of T2 group were ( 8.3 ± 1.0) and (3.0 ± 0. 6) , which were lower than those of T1 group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The pancreatic and placenta pathological scores of T3 group were ( 8.0 ± 1.4 ) and ( 2. 8 ± 0. 8 ), respetively, which were no significant difference from those of T2 group ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion The peritoneal administration of MIF inhibitor probably has protective effect on the pancreatic and placental injury in late pregnancy rat with ANP. ISO-1 dosage in T2 group (3.5 mg/kg) is the optimal and safe dosage for attenuating pancreatic and placental injuries in rat model of ANP in late pregnancy.
出处 《中华急诊医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期45-49,共5页 Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(81370562) 湖北省自然科学基金(2013CFB458) 湖北省卫生厅科研基金重点资助项目(JX6A07)
关键词 ISO-1 胰腺炎 妊娠 胰腺 胎盘 量效关系 ISO-1 Pancreatitis Pregnancy Pancreas Placenta Dose-effect relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Al-Abed Y, Dabideen D, Aljabari B, et al, ISO-1 binding to the tautomerase active site of MIF inhibits its pro-inflammatory activity and increases survival in severe sepsis [ J]. J Biol Chem, 2005, 280 (44) : 36541-36544. DOI: 10. 1074/jbc. C500243200.
  • 2Nicoletti F, Creange A, Orlikowski D, et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) seems crucially involved in Guillain-Barre syndrome and experimental allergic neuritis [ J ]. J Neuroimmunol, 2005, 168 (1/2): 168-174. DOI: 10.1016/ j. jneuroim. 2005.07. 019.
  • 3陈辰,王卫星,郝顺心,冯加锐,严恒,徐胜,陈晓燕.罗格列酮对大鼠重症急性胰腺炎的作用[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2008,17(10):1027-1030. 被引量:5
  • 4Schmidt J, Rattner DW, Lewandrowski K, et al. A better model of acute pancreatitis for evaluating therapy [J]. Ann Surger, 1992, 215 (1) : 44-56. DOI: 10. 1097/00000658-199201000-00007.
  • 5徐丽南,林楠,张颖,蔡坚,王子莲.妊娠合并急性胰腺炎大鼠胎盘组织细胞黏附分子E-选择素的表达及意义[J].中国病理生理杂志,2011,27(9):1781-1785. 被引量:4
  • 6Robertson KW, Stewart IS, Imrie CW. Severe acute pancreatitis and pregnancy [ J ]. Pancreatology, 2006, 6 ( 4 ) : 309-315. DOI: 10. 1159/000092694.
  • 7Stimac D, Stimac T. Acute pancreatitis during pregnancy [ J ]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2011, 23 (10) : 839-844. DOI: 10. 1097/MEG. 0b013e328349b199.
  • 8Geng YX, Li WQ, Sun LQ, et al. Severe acute pancreatitis during pregnancy: eleven years experience from a surgical intensive care unit [J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2011, 56 (12): 3672-3677. DOI: 10. 1007/s10620-011-1809-5.
  • 9Eddy JJ, Gideonsen MD, Song JY, et al. Pancreatitis in pregnancy [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 112 ( 5 ) : 1075-1081. DOI: 10. 1097/AOG. Ob013e318185a032.
  • 10Wang YZ, Wang SW, Zhang YC, et al. Protective effect of exogenous IGF-! on the intestinalroucosal barrier in rats with severe acute pancreatitis[J].World journal of eroergency medicine, 2012, 3 (3): 213-220. DOI: lO. 5847/wjero. j. 1920-8642. 2012. 03. OlO.

二级参考文献40

共引文献13

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部