摘要
目的比较分体式铸造桩组和纤维桩组用于修复后牙牙体大面积缺损病例的疗效。方法选取2012年1月～2014年12月我院收治的患者139例中经完善根管治疗的后牙残根残冠154颗作为研究对象，将其分为分体式铸造桩核冠90颗和纤维桩核冠64颗，对其进行修复，观察其疗效。结果随访3年，分体式铸造桩核冠组与纤维桩核冠组成功率对比，差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论在3年的随访期内，分体式铸造桩核冠和纤维桩核冠修复磨牙残根残冠的疗效相当。
Objective To compare the cast pile group and fiber pile group for clinical repair of posterior teeth with large area defect cases. Methods Selected in January 2012 to 2014 in December in our hospital admitted patients in 139 cases after perfect root canal treatment of posterior residual crown and root of the 154 pieces as the object of study, divided into split type casting pile nuclear crown 90 teeth and fiber post core crown 64 teeth, the repair, to observe its efficacy. Results There were no significant differences in the composition of the 3 years between the years and the difference between the power of the core and the fiber post core crown （P〉0.05）. Conclusion In the 3years of follow-up, the clinical effect of the split cast post and core crown and fiber post core crown restoration of molar residual root and crown has little difference.
出处
《全科口腔医学电子杂志》
2015年第10期16-17,共2页
Electronic Journal of General Stomatology
关键词
铸造桩
纤维桩
残根残冠
Cast post
Fiber post
Residual root crown
