大五人格与主观职业成功的关系:对过去15年研究的元分析被引量：33

The Relationship between Big-five Personality and Subjective Career Success:A Meta-analysis of the Prior 15-year Researches

原文传递

导出

摘要本研究运用元分析的方法,对过去15年关于大五人格与主观职业成功(即职业满意度)的关系研究进行定量评述。通过文献检索,共筛选出包含17331个样本量的16篇有效文献,元分析结果发现:大五人格与职业满意度显著相关,其中神经质与职业满意度的相关性最高(r=-0.339),外向性(r=0.217)和宜人性(r=0.158)次之,尽责性(r=0.137)和经验开放性(r=0.125)最低;大五人格测量方法、研究的时间跨度、区域文化以及岗位类别等对大五人格和职业满意度之间的关系起到调节作用。结果说明,大五人格能够有效地预测职业满意度,且在不同地区、不同岗位大五人格和职业满意度的关系存在一定的差异性。研究还对进一步探讨大五人格与职业满意度的关系提出了展望。 Using Meta-analysis, we conduct a qualitative review on the prior 15-year literatures of the relationship between Big-five personality and subjective career success （career satisfaction）. A 17331 sample included in 16 valuable papers is selected through literature search, the analysis on which show that： Big-five personality is positively related to career satisfaction; the relationship between neuroticism （r=-0. 339） and career satisfaction is the highest, followed by extravert （r=0. 158） and agreeableness （r=0. 158）, and then responsibility （r = 0. 137） and open to experience （r = 0. 125 ） ; the measurement of personality, the time span of data, job category moderated the relationship between big-five personality and career satisfaction. It infers that Big-five personality is a significant predictor of ca- reer satisfaction, and the relationship between them varies in different regions and different job categories. The direction of further exploring the relationship between personality and career satisfaction is discussed as well.

作者翁清雄彭传虎曹威麟席酉民

机构地区中国科学技术大学管理学院西安交通大学管理学院

出处《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期83-95,共13页 Management Review

基金国家自然科学基金优秀青年基金项目(71422014) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71373251) 教育部博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20133402120015)

关键词大五人格职业满意度主观职业成功元分析调节效应 Big-five personality, subjective career success, career satisfaction, meta-analysis, moderated effects

分类号 F272.92 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献70

1翁清雄,席酉民.职业成长理论研究简评[J].预测,2010,29(6):1-7. 被引量：42
2Weng Q. X., McElroy J. C. Organizational Career Growth, Afective Occupational Commitment and Turnover Intentions [ J]. Jour- nal of Vocational Behavior, 2012,80 (2) : 256-265.
3Weng Q. X., McElroy J. C., Morrow P., Liu R. Z. The Relationship between Career Growth and Organizational Commitment[ J ]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2010,77 (3) : 391-400.
4Ng T. W. H., Eby L. T., Sorensen K. L., et al. Predictors of Objective and Subjective Career Success: A Meta-Analysis[ J ]. Per- sonnel Psychology, 2005,58 (2) : 367-408.
5Guilford J. P., Guilford R. B. Personality Fators S, E, and M, and their Measurement [ J ]. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisci-plinary and Applied, 1936,2(1) :109-127.
6Cattell R. B. Description and Measurement of Personality[ M]. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book, 1946.
7Eysenck H. J. The Biological Basis of Personality[ M]. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1967.
8Schinka J. A., Kinder B. N., Kremer T. Research Validity Scales for the NEO-PI-R: Development and Initial Validity[ J]. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1997,68( 1 ) : 127-138.
9Judge T. A., Heller D., Mount M. K. Five-Factor Model of Personality and Job Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis[ J]. Journal of Ap- plied Psychology, 2002,87 (3) : 530-541.
10Reed M. B., Bruch M. A., Haase R. F. Five-Factor Model of Personality and Career Exploration[J]. Journal of Career Assess- ment, 2004,12(3) :223-238.