摘要
目的:比较我国初中生不同的家庭教养方式和人格在城乡之间的差异,掌握初中生父母不同家庭教养方式与人格之间的相关程度。方法:采用父母教养方式评价量表、艾森克人格问卷(少年版)对沧州市及潍坊市307名初中生进行问卷调查。结果:1城市与农村户口的初中生在父亲过度干涉上差异有统计学意义,城市得分高于农村(t=1.983,P<0.05);2城市和农村户口的初中生在内外向维度上差异有统计学意义,城市得分高于农村(t=2.071,P<0.05);3在精神质维度上,与父、母的情感温暖与理解呈负相关(r=-0.235,-0.256;P<0.01),与父、母的惩罚、严厉,过度干涉,拒绝、否认,过度保护呈正相关(r=0.354,0.192,0.369,0.215;0.361,0.234,0.347;P<0.01),在内外向维度上,与父、母的情感温暖与理解(r=0.121,0.129;P<0.05),父亲的过度干涉呈正相关(r=0.129,P<0.05),在神经质维度上,与父、母的拒绝、否认及惩罚、严厉,过度保护呈正相关(r=0.195,0.171,0.174;0.262,0.247,0.264;P<0.01),与父亲的过分干涉呈正相关(r=0.122,P<0.05),在掩饰性上,与父、母的情感温暖、理解呈正相关(r=0.221,0.231;P<0.01),与父、母的惩罚、严厉,拒绝、否认呈负相关(r=-0.170,-0.216;-0.224,-0.262;P<0.01)。结论:1城市父亲较农村父亲过度干涉孩子较多;2城市孩子较农村孩子人格外向,渴望刺激和冒险,情感易于冲动;3积极的家庭教养方式容易形成稳定、外向、坦诚的人格特征,消极的家庭教养方式则易形成不稳定、内向、虚伪的人格特征。
Objective：To compare urban and rural junior school students＇ parenting styles and personality traits and their relationship.Methods：A total of 307 junior school students in Cang zhou and Weifang were investigated by Egma Minnen av Bardndosnaupp forstran（EMBU）and Eysenck personality questionnaire（EPQ）（youth）.Results：①Urban and rural junior school students had significant difference in his father＇s excessive interference,and the former scored higher than the latter（r=1.983,P〈0.05）;②Urban and rural junior school students had significant difference in extraversion and the former scored higher than the latter（r=2.071,P〈0.05）;③Negative relationship was found between psychoticism and fathers and mothers＇ warm（r=-0.235,-0.256;P〈0.01）,positive relationship was found between psychoticism and fathers and mothers＇ severe punishment,over-interference,refusal and denying attitude,over-protection（r=0.354,0.192,0.369,0.215;0.361,0.234,0.347;P〈0.01）;Positive relationship was found between extraversion and fathers and mothers＇ warm（r=0.121,0.129;P〈0.05）,and fathers＇ over-interference（r=0.129,P〈0.05）;Positive relationship was found between neuroticism and fathers＇ and mothers＇ refusal and denying attitude,severe punishment,over-protection（r=0.195,0.171,0.174;0.247,0.262,0.264;P〈0.01）,and fathers＇ over-interference（r=0.122,P〈0.05）;Positive relationship was found between dissimulation and fathers and mothers＇ warm（r=0.221,0.231;P〈0.01）,negative relationship was found between dissimulation and fathers and mothers＇ severe punishment,refusal and denying attitude（r=-0.170,-0.216;-0.224,-0.262;P〈0.01）.Conclusion：①Urban fathers are more excessive interference in children than rural fathers;②Urban children are more outgoing,desired for excitement and adventure and emotional than rural children;③Positive parenting styles are easier to form a stable,outgoing,straight-out personality traits,negative parenting styles are easy to form a unstable,introverted and false personality traits.
出处
《中国健康心理学杂志》
2016年第1期123-126,共4页
China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词
城乡
初中生
家庭教养方式
人格
相关性
Urban and rural areas
Junior high school students
Parenting styles
Personality
Relevance
