期刊文献+

公司治理、政治关联与环境绩效 被引量:17

Corporate Governance, Political Connection and Environmental Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以沪市A股重污染行业上市公司为研究对象,运用J-F系数法从环保目标、法规和惩处构建环境绩效,考察了公司治理和政治关联对环境绩效的影响,探讨了政治关联在公司治理和环境绩效关系中的作用。研究结果表明,股权性质、董事会规模和两权分离促进了环境绩效,政治关联与环境绩效呈负相关关系,政治关联会抑制公司治理对环境绩效的正向提升作用,拓展了环境绩效的研究视角,为提升公司治理和环境绩效水平提供了经验证据。 Using listed companies in heavy polluting industry as the research object from 2009 to 2014. We calculate environmental performance from environmental objectives, rules and punishment. The paper investigates relationship between corporate governance, political connection and environmental performance, and explores the role of political connection in environmental performance and corporate governance. The study finds that the state, board size and separation of ownership improve environmental performance, the political connection and environmental performance has a significant negative relationship, the enhancing the level of political connection weaken the positive impact of corporate governance to increase the environmental performance, we provide empirical evidence for corporate governance, political connection and environmental performance.
出处 《当代经济管理》 CSSCI 2016年第2期19-25,共7页 Contemporary Economic Management
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目(13AZD002) 国家留学基金建设高水平大学公派研究生项目(201406640032) 大信审计教育研究基金的阶段性研究成果。
关键词 公司治理 政治关联 环境绩效 环境溢价 社会责任 corporate governance political connection environmental performance environmental premium corporate social responsibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Ramanathan R., Poomkaew B., Nath P. The Impact of Organiza-tional Pressures on Environmental Performance of Firms [J]. Busi-ness Ethics: A European Review, 2014, 23(2): 169-182.
  • 2Charl V., Naiker V. The Effect of Board Characteristics on FirmEnvironmental Performance [J]. Journal of Management, 2011, 37(6): 1636-1663.
  • 3Christopher S. A., Jennifer L. B., Alan D. Corporate Governance,Incentives, and Tax Avoidance [J]. Journal of Accounting and Eco-nomics, 2015, 60(1): 1-17.
  • 4Salo J. Corporate Governance and Environmental Performance: In-dustry and Country Effects [J]. Competition & Change, 2008, 12(4): 328-354.
  • 5Ghazali N. A. Ownership Structure and Corporate Social Respon-sibility Disclosure: Some Malaysian Evidence [J]. Corporate Gover-nance, 2007, 7(3): 251-266.
  • 6高明华,苏然,方芳.中国上市公司董事会治理评价及有效性检验[J].经济学动态,2014(2):24-35. 被引量:16
  • 7Elsayed K., Paton D. The Impact of Financial Performance on En-vironmental Policy: Does Firm Life Cycle Matter- [J]. BusinessStrategy & the Environment, 2009, 18(6): 397-413.
  • 8李维安,徐建.董事会独立性、总经理继任与战略变化幅度——独立董事有效性的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2014,17(1):4-13. 被引量:83
  • 9Patton A., Baker A. J. Why Won't Directors Rock the Boat [J].Harvard Business Review, 1987,12: 10-18.
  • 10Pascual B., Luis R. G. Environmental Performance and ExecutiveCompensation: An Integrated Agency-Institutional Perspective [J].Academy of Management Journal, 2009, 52(1): 103-126.

二级参考文献189

共引文献432

同被引文献352

引证文献17

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部