期刊文献+

原发性乳腺恶性淋巴瘤诊断及治疗进展 被引量:1

Advances in diagnosis and treatment of malignant primary breast lymphoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 原发性乳腺恶性淋巴瘤发病率极低,占乳腺恶性肿瘤的比例不足0.5%,其临床表现缺乏特异性,常以单侧乳房无痛性乳腺肿块为首发症状;病理组织学检查是该疾病诊断与鉴别诊断重点,病理类型以弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤居多,治疗方式不同于乳腺癌,宜以化疗为主,并辅以放疗等的综合治疗;易发生全身扩散以及中枢性复发,预后较差。 Malignant primary breast lymphoma(PBL)has an extremely low morbidity, accounting for less than 0.5% of mammary gland malignant tumors. Lacking of specific clinical manifestations ,its primary symptom is usually unilateral painless breast lump. Histologic diagnosis is the key point to its diagnosis and antidiastole and diffuse large B cell lymphoma is the major pathological type, whose therapeutic strategy is different from the breast cancer. Comprehensive therapy relies mainly on chemotherapy supplemented by radiotherapy. Poor prognosis is due to its tendency to systemic metastases and recurrence in the central nervous system.
出处 《临床外科杂志》 2015年第12期952-954,共3页 Journal of Clinical Surgery
关键词 原发性乳腺恶性淋巴瘤 治疗 预后 primary breast lymphoma treatment prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

二级参考文献68

  • 1李娜,姜玉新,戴晴.原发性非霍奇金乳腺淋巴瘤的超声影像学特征[J].中国医学科学院学报,2010,32(3):289-292. 被引量:14
  • 2沈存芳.原发于乳腺的恶性淋巴瘤8例临床分析[J].山东医药,2007,47(25):91-92. 被引量:9
  • 3朱丽萍,倪多,韩宝三,房新志,吐尔鸿,波拉提,张国庆.男性原发性乳腺淋巴瘤误诊误治一例[J].临床误诊误治,2007,20(10):71-71. 被引量:3
  • 4Hall M J, Reid JE, Burbidge LA, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women of different ethnicities undergoing testing for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer [ J ]. Cancer,2009,115 (10) :2222-2233.
  • 5Meads C, Ahmed I, Riley RD. A systemat- ic review of breast cancer incidence risk prediction models with meta-analysis of their performance[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2012,132(2) :365-377.
  • 6Gall MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP et al. Pro- jecting individualized probabilities of de- veloping breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually [J]. J Natl Cancer last,1989,81 (24) :1879-1886.
  • 7Anderson SJ, Ahnn S, Duff K. NSABP Breast Cancer Prevention Trial risk as ses- sment program, version 2 [ J]. NSABP Bio- statistical Center Technical Report, 1992.
  • 8Roekhill B, Spiegelman D, Byrne C, et al. Validation of the Gall et almodel of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention[ J ]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2001,93 ( 5 ) :358-366.
  • 9Adams-CampbeU LL, Makambi KH, Palm- er JR, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the Gail model in the Black Women's Health Study[J]. Breast,2007 ,13(4) :332-336.
  • 10Chay WY, Ong WS, Tan PH, et al. Valida- tion of the Gall model for predicting indi- vidual breast cancer risk in a prospective nationwide study of 28, 104 Singapore women [ J] Breast Cancer Res, 2012,30, 14 ( 1 ) : R19.

共引文献18

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部