期刊文献+

我国中学物理教学思想中物理核心范畴的流变与反思 被引量:3

The Evolution and Introspection of the Core Categories of the Physics Teaching in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国中学物理教学思想在发展中相继提出了不同的物理学核心范畴,其"前范畴"是"题海战术"。"物理概念与定律"、"物理规律"、"科学方法"、"核心概念"为4种"核心范畴"。它们针对的分别为题海战术、理论态度、批判性思维以及科学的整体性。物理核心范畴带来的启示包括继承理论自觉、保有问题意识、坚守物理品性、拓展应用价值。 In the thought development of physics teaching, different kinds of core categories of physics were put forward, and "sea of exams tactics" is their "pre-category". "Physics concepts and laws", "physics laws", "scientific methods", "core concepts" are four kinds of "core categories". They aimed at sea of exams tactics, theoretical attitude, critical thinking and the integrity of science respectively. The revelation of the core categories of physics includes inheritance of the theory, consciousness of retaining problems, character of adherence to physics and the application value.
作者 胡扬洋
出处 《北京教育学院学报(自然科学版)》 2015年第4期50-54,共5页 Journal of Beijing Institute of Education
基金 首都师范大学2015年博士研究生"学术创新与优秀学位论文培育计划"
关键词 中学物理教学思想 物理核心范畴 题海战术 科学方法 核心概念 thought of physics teaching thought physical core category sea of exams tactics scientific method core concept
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献22

  • 1高凌飚.在物理教学中应重视科学方法的教育[J].物理教师,1992,25(4):1-4. 被引量:18
  • 2Mark R Wilson, Meryl W Bertenthal. Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement// National Research Council. Systems for state science Assess- ments// Washington D C: National Academies Press, 2005: 18, 203.
  • 3R A Duschl, H A Schweingruber, A W Shouse (Eds). Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade [M] // National Research Council. Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: Na- tional Academies Press. 2007: 213.
  • 4Tom Corcoran, Frederic A Mosher Aaron Rogat. Learning Progressions in Science An Evidence-based Approach to Reform [R]. Consortium for Policy Re- search in Education, 2009: 29.
  • 5Michelene T H Chi, Stephen J Ceci. Content Knowl- edge: Its Role, Representation, and Restructering in Memory Development [M]//H W Reese (Ed). Ad- vances in Child Development and Behavior. Orlando FL: Academic Press, 1987: 91-142.
  • 6Michelene T H Chi. Three Types of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental Model Transforma- tion, and Categorical Shift [M] // S Vosniadou (Ed). Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 2008: 61-82.
  • 7Cokhan Ozdemir, Douglas B Clark. An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories [J]. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2007, 3 (4): 351-361.
  • 8Ivan Salinas. Learning Progressions in Science Educa- tion: Two Approaches for Development [C] // Paper presented at the Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS). Conference, June 2009, Iowa City, IA-1.
  • 9James W Pellegrino, Naomi Chudowsky, Robert Gla- ser (Eds). Committee on the Foundations of Assess- ment [M] // National Research Council. Knowing what students know:The science and design of edu- cational assessment. Washington, D C: National A- cademies Press, 2001.
  • 10Shawn Y Stevens, Ce'sar Delgado, Joseph S Krajeik. Developkng a Hypothetical Multidimensional Leaming Pro- gresion for the Nature of Matter [J]. Journal of Reaearch in Science Teaching, 2010, 47 (6): 688.

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部