摘要
目的寻找更佳的腹腔镜消化性溃疡穿孔修补术的手术方式。方法回顾性分析腹腔镜消化性溃疡穿孔修补术患者37例的临床资料,其中经脐单孔腹腔镜消化性溃疡穿孔修补术(单孔组)15例,双孔腹腔镜消化性溃疡穿孔修补术(双孔组)22例。比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、卧床时间、住院时间、切口感染率、使用镇痛剂情况。结果双孔组手术时间、术后排气时间及住院时间较单孔组明显缩短(P<0.05),术后切口感染发生率较单孔组明显减少(P<0.05);2组术中出血量、卧床时间、使用镇痛剂差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论双孔腹腔镜消化性溃疡穿孔修补术操作方便、安全、手术时间短、术后切口感染率低、术后进食早、住院时间短,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To search for a better method for laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation.Methods Retrospective analyzed 37 cases underwent laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation,the transumbilical single hole group(15cases),the double holes laparoscopic group(22cases).Comparative analysis of the transumbilical single hole group and the double holes laparoscopic group of patients with operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume,postoperative fasting time,lied in bed time,hospitalization time,analgesic use.Results The operation time,postoperative exhaust time and hospitalization time of double holes laparoscopic group were significantly shorter than thoes of single port laparoscopic group(P〈0.05);The incision infection of double holes laparoscopic group was significantly reduced than that of single hole laparoscopic group(P〈0.05);The amount of intraoperative bleeding,analgesic use and the mortality rate between the two groups had no significant difference(P〉0.05).ConclusionDouble holes laparoscopic repair was more convenient and more safety than transumbilical single port laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation,the operation time was shorter,the incision infection rate was lower,the recovery time of intestinal peristalsis and the hospitalization time were shorter.
出处
《河北医科大学学报》
CAS
2016年第2期151-153,165,共4页
Journal of Hebei Medical University