期刊文献+

不同型号膝关节固定平台假体匹配的三维有限元生物力学分析 被引量:10

Three-dimensional dynamic finite element study on biomechanis of different prosthesis size matching in total knee arthroplasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨基于CT及MRI二维图像数据准确构建出膝关节三维数字有限元模型的可行性,并采用有限元方法分析假体型号不匹配时人工膝关节假体接触表面的应力变化情况。方法:随机选取1名健康成年男性为研究对象,为了对置换后不同型号匹配的膝关节假体进行受力分析将实验对象分为3组。将通过Mimics软件建立膝关节三维数字化模型,按照全膝关节置换标准对膝关节三维数字模型进行虚拟截骨和假体安装,建立全膝关节置换术(TKA)后三维有限元模型。结果:当股骨与胫骨假体的型号不匹配时(F≠T),股骨假体及聚乙烯垫片上受到的最大等效应力都会增加,尤其而当股骨假体小于胫骨假体时(F<T),应力增加更明显。结论 :TKA过程中若股骨假体与胫骨假体型号不匹配,股骨假体及聚乙烯垫片上最大等效应力增加,可能会导致聚乙烯垫片远期磨损增加。 Objective To study the possibility of three dimensional dynamic finite element model based on two-dimensional CT and MRI image data from the knee joint, and to analyze the prosthesis surface contact stress changes when the prosthesis size mismatched by finite element method. Methods The three-dimensional digital model of the knee joint was reconstructed through Mimics software. According to total knee replacement criteria, three-dimensional model bone cutting and prosthesis implant were simulated. Thereby, three-dimensional dynamic finite element model of total knee replacement was constructed. The data was analyzed by SPSS 19.0software, and the significant level α = 0.05. Results The maximum equivalent stress of the femoral prosthesis and polyethylene gasket increased when the femoral prosthesis size and the tibia prosthesis size mismatched(F≠ T). The stress increased more obviously when the femoral component were less than the tibial prosthesis(F T). Conclusion The maximum equivalent stress of the femoral prosthesis and polyethylene gasket increased when the femoral prosthesis size and the tibia prosthesis size mismatched, which may increase polyethylene wear.
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第2期222-225,共4页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
基金 云南省创新团队项目(编号:2014HC018) 云南省国际合作项目(编号:2013IA004) 云南省医学学科带头人培养基金(编号:D-201207)
关键词 全膝关节置换 匹配 数字化模型 生物力学 有限元分析 Total knee arthroplasty Match 3D digital model Biomechanics Finite element analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献49

  • 1潘哲尔,黄加张,顾湘杰,丁祖泉,张纯武,叶澄宇,李建策.磁共振影像膝关节三维有限元模型的建立[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(4):268-270. 被引量:12
  • 2陈欣,熊岳山.基于二维轮廓序列的膝关节三维重建[J].计算机应用,2007,27(3):683-685. 被引量:3
  • 3Buechel FF Sr. Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement [ J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002, (404) :40-50.
  • 4Attar FG, Khaw FM, Kirk LM, et al. Survivorship analysis at 15 years of cemented press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty [ J ]. J Arthroplasty, 2008,23 ( 3 ) :344-349.
  • 5Hitt K, Shurman JR 2nd, Greene K, et al. Anthropometrie meas- urements of the human knee : correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems [ J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003,85-A Suppl 4 : 115-122.
  • 6Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, et al. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1996, (331) :35-46.
  • 7Greene KA. Gender-specific desi~ in total knee arthroplasty [ J ] J Arthroplasty, 2007.22(7 SupDI 3):27-31.
  • 8罗小平.不同年龄段正常膝关节软骨厚度的MRI测量研究[J].实用临床医学(江西),2007,8(7):98-99. 被引量:6
  • 9Kim YH, Kim JS, Choe JW, et al. Long term comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bem'ing total knee replacements in patients younger than lift.one years of age with osteoarthritis J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2012, 94(10) :866-873.
  • 10Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, et al. Total knee replacement in yotmg, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1997, 79(4) :575-582.

共引文献21

同被引文献94

  • 1Pierce TP, Cherian JJ, Mont MA. Static and dynamic bracing for lossof motion following total knee arthroplasty. J Long Term Eff MedImplants, 2015, 25(4): 337-343.
  • 2Malkani AL, Hitt KD> Badarudeen S, et al. The difficult porimarytotal knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Led, 2016,65: 243-268.
  • 3Hommel H, Perka C. Gap-balancing technique combined withpatient -specific instrumentation in TKA. Arch Orthop TraumaSurg, 2015,135(11): 1603-1608.
  • 4van Kempen RW, Schimmel JJ, van Hellemondt GG, et al. Reasonfor revision TKA predicts clinical outcome: prospective evaluationof 150 consecutive patients with 2-years followup. Clin Orthop RelatRes, 2013, 471(7): 2296-2302.
  • 5Maas A, Kim TK, Miehlke RK, et al. Differences in anatomy andkinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA patients: influence onimplant positioning and subsequent loading conditions in mobilebearing knees. Biomed Res Int, 2014,2014: 612838.
  • 6Koh IJ, Cho WS, Choi NY, et al. Causes, risk factors, and trendsin failures after TKA in Korea over the past 5 years: a multicenterstudy. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014,472(1): 316-326.
  • 7Iorio R, Della Valle CJ, Healy WL, et al. Stratification ofstandardized TKA complications and adverse events: a briefcommunication. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014,472(1): 194-205.
  • 8Schotanus MG, Pilot P, Kaptein BL, et al. No difference in terms ofradiostereometric analysis between fixed- and mobile-bearing totalknee arthroplasty: a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. KneeSurg Sports Traumatol Arthroscy 2016. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 9Weber O, Goost H, Mueller M, et al. Mid-term results after post—traumatic knee joint replacement in elderly patients. Z OrthopUnfall, 2011, 149(2): 166-172.
  • 10Sato T, Koga Y, Omori G. Three-dimensional lower extremityalignment assessment system: application to evaluation ofcomponent position after total knee arthroplasty. / Arthroplasty,2004,19(5): 620-628.

引证文献10

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部