摘要
目的探讨负压封闭引流技术(VSD)及常规护理对难治性压疮创面的护理效果。方法选取难治性压疮创面患者76例随机分为对照组和VSD组各38例,对照组采用传统的护理方式进行护理,VSD组患者采用VSD及常规护理方式进行护理,统计治疗后2、4周创面愈合率,并记录创面完全愈合时间,调查患者的护理满意度。结果 VSD组治疗后2、4周创面愈合率均显著高于对照组(P<0.05);VSD组创面完全愈合时间、换药次数均显著少于对照组(P<0.05);VSD组护理满意度显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论负压封闭引流技术配合常规护理对难治性压疮创面的护理效果好,能改善治疗效果,提高患者的满意度,值得临床合理使用。
Objective To compare nursing effect of vacuum sealing drainage（ VSD） technology and conventional nursing on the treatment of refractory ulcers. Methods A total of 76 patients with refractory ulcers in our hospital were randomly divided into control group and VSD group,with 38 cases in each group. The control group used traditional nursing,and VSD group was given VSD and routine nursing,wound healing rate after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment was recorded,and wound completely healing time as well as nursing satisfaction were recorded and investigated. Results Wound healing rate in the VSD group was higher than that of the control group after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment（ P 〈 0. 05）. Wounds completely healing time and dressing change frequency in the VSD group were less than that of the control group（ P 〈 0. 05）. Nursing satisfaction in the VSD group was significantly higher than that in the control group（ P 〈 0. 05）. Conclusion VSD technology and conventional nursing in the treatment of refractory sore wounds can improve the treatment efficacy,and increase the patient’s satisfaction,so it is worthy of clinical promotion.
出处
《实用临床医药杂志》
CAS
2016年第4期53-55,共3页
Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
关键词
难治性压疮创面
负压封闭引流技术
常规护理
refractory pressure sore
vacuum sealing drainage technology
conventional nursing
