期刊文献+

Clinical efficacy and drug resistance of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy in colorectal cancer 被引量:4

Clinical efficacy and drug resistance of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy in colorectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Colorectal cancer(CRC) ranked third in cancer related death and its incidence has been increasing worldwide. In recent decades important therapeutic advances have been developed in treatment of metastatic CRC(mCRC), such as monoclonal antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor(anti-EGFR), which provided additional clinical benefits in mCRC. However, anti-EGFR therapies have limited usage due to approximately 95% of patients with KRAS mutated mCRC do not response to anti-EGFR treatment. Thus, KRAS mutation is predictive of nonresponse to anti-EGFR therapies but it alone is not a sufficient basis to decide who should not be received such therapies because; approximately fifty percent(40%-60%) of CRC patients with wild-type KRAS mutation also have poor response to anti-EGFR based treatment. This fact leads us to suspect that there must be other molecular determinants of response to anti-EGFR therapies which have not been identified yet. Current article summarizes the clinical efficacy of anti-EGFR therapies and also evaluates its resistance mechanisms. Colorectal cancer(CRC) ranked third in cancer related death and its incidence has been increasing worldwide. In recent decades important therapeutic advances have been developed in treatment of metastatic CRC(mCRC), such as monoclonal antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor(anti-EGFR), which provided additional clinical benefits in mCRC. However, anti-EGFR therapies have limited usage due to approximately 95% of patients with KRAS mutated mCRC do not response to anti-EGFR treatment. Thus, KRAS mutation is predictive of nonresponse to anti-EGFR therapies but it alone is not a sufficient basis to decide who should not be received such therapies because; approximately fifty percent(40%-60%) of CRC patients with wild-type KRAS mutation also have poor response to anti-EGFR based treatment. This fact leads us to suspect that there must be other molecular determinants of response to anti-EGFR therapies which have not been identified yet. Current article summarizes the clinical efficacy of anti-EGFR therapies and also evaluates its resistance mechanisms.
出处 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology》 SCIE CAS 2016年第1期1-7,共7页 世界胃肠肿瘤学杂志(英文版)(电子版)
关键词 Colorectal cancer EPIDERMAL GROWTH factorreceptor KRAS mutation Anti-epidermal GROWTH factorreceptor antibody Drug resistance Colorectal cancer Epidermal growth factor receptor KRAS mutation Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody Drug resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献51

  • 1Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Globalcancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69-90 [PMID:21296855 DOI: 10.3322/caac.20107].
  • 2Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancerstatistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59: 225-249 [PMID:19474385 DOI: 10.3322/caac.20006].
  • 3Alberts SR, Wagman LD. Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer livermetastases. Oncologist 2008; 13: 1063-1073 [PMID: 18838438DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0142].
  • 4Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA CancerJ Clin 2015; 65: 5-29 [PMID: 25559415 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21254].
  • 5Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. United StatesCancer Statistics: US Cancer Statistics Working Group, 2013.Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/uscs.
  • 6Van Cutsem E, K-hne CH, Hitre E, Zaluski J, Chang Chien CR,Makhson A, D'Haens G, Pintér T, Lim R, Bodoky G, Roh JK,Folprecht G, Ruff P, Stroh C, Tejpar S, Schlichting M, Nippgen J,Rougier P. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment formetastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 1408-1417[PMID: 19339720 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805019].
  • 7Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, Khayat D, Bleiberg H,Santoro A, Bets D, Mueser M, Harstrick A, Verslype C, ChauI, Van Cutsem E. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plusirinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. NEngl J Med 2004; 351: 337-345 [PMID: 15269313 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa033025].
  • 8Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Burkes R, BarugelM, Humblet Y, Bodoky G, Cunningham D, Jassem J, Rivera F,Kocákova I, Ruff P, B-asińska-Morawiec M, -makal M, CanonJL, Rother M, Oliner KS, Wolf M, Gansert J. Randomized, phaseIII trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin,and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-linetreatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectalcancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 4697-4705 [PMID:20921465 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.4860].
  • 9Peeters M, Price TJ, Cervantes A, Sobrero AF, Ducreux M, HotkoY, André T, Chan E, Lordick F, Punt CJ, Strickland AH, WilsonG, Ciuleanu TE, Roman L, Van Cutsem E, Tzekova V, CollinsS, Oliner KS, Rong A, Gansert J. Randomized phase III studyof panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan(FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatmentin patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:4706-4713 [PMID: 20921462 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.6055].
  • 10Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Humblet Y, Hendlisz A, NeynsB, Canon JL, Van Laethem JL, Maurel J, Richardson G, Wolf M,Amado RG. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus bestsupportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patientswith chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J ClinOncol 2007; 25: 1658-1664 [PMID: 17470858 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1620].

同被引文献16

引证文献4

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部