摘要
目的:比较腹腔镜右半结肠切除术和开放右半结肠切除术的临床效果,探讨前者的安全性和有效性。方法:分析2010年1月-2013年1月中山大学附属第一医院胃肠外科收治的53例右半结肠癌患者的临床资料,其中25例行腹腔镜右半结肠切除术,28例行开放右半结肠切除术,比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、清除淋巴结数、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症等。结果:腹腔镜组出血量(69.8±30.2)m L少于开腹组的(133.6±36.6)m L,术后肛门排气时间(49.7±9.6)h小于开腹组的(60.6±10.7)h,术后住院时间(7.0±1.4)d短于开腹组的(11.5±2.4)d,两组患者比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。而两组患者的手术时间、清除淋巴结数及术后并发症发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:腹腔镜右半结肠切除术具有手术创伤小、疼痛轻、康复快的优点并且符合肿瘤根治原则,是安全有效的,值得推广。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficiency laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with conventional open right hemicolectomy, investigate the safety and effectiveness of the former. Method: 53 iight colon carcinoma patients in First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2010 to January 2013 were selected, among 25 patients who underwent laparoscopic fight hemicolectomy ( laparoscopy group ) and 28 patients who underwent conventional open fight hemicolectomy ( open group ) . The operative time, blood loss, numbers of lymph nodes harvested time to first postoperative flatus, clays of postoperative stay and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared. Result: Blood loss of the laparoscopy group was significantly less than the open group [ ( 69.8 ±30.2 ) vs ( 133.6 ± 36.6 ) mL] ( P〈0.05 ) . The time to first postoperative flatus [ ( 49.7 ±9.6 ) vs ( 60.6 ± 10.7 ) hi and days of postoperative stay [ ( 7.0 ±1.4 ) vs ( 11.5 ± 2.4 ) d] in the laparoscopy group were significantly shorter than those in the open group ( P〈0.05 ) . There were no significant differences in operative time, numbers of lymph nodes harvested and postoperative complications of the two groups ( P〉0.05 ) .Conclusion: Laparoscopie right hemicolectomy have the advantages of excellent minimally invasive effect, and is also accord with principle of malignant tumor radical resection. So it is safe and effective , be worth to promote.
出处
《中国医学创新》
CAS
2016年第6期36-39,共4页
Medical Innovation of China
基金
黄埔区科技计划项目(201544-04)