期刊文献+

MRI同反相位成像、表观扩散系数以及弥散加权成像序列在椎体良恶性疾病鉴别中的价值 被引量:7

Value of MRI in-phase and opposed-phase,apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion-weighted imaging in distinguishing benign and malignant spinal lesions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨MRI的同反相位成像(IP/OP)、表观扩散系数(ADC)以及弥散加权成像(DWI)序列在鉴别椎体良恶性疾病中的应用价值。方法选择恶性肿瘤椎体压缩骨折患者80例作为恶性组,良性疾病导致的椎体压缩性骨折80例作为良性组,均行MRI常规序列及DWI扫描,并采用双回波技术在3D快速扰相梯度回波序列中采集IP/OP图像;分析良恶性病变病例的DWI信号特点,定量测定两组椎体的ADC值、信号强度比(SIR)值和信号衰减程度(SAR)值。结果良性及恶性组病灶DWI序列均可表现为高、等、低或混杂信号,两组DWI信号改变情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);良性组ADC值为(2.24±0.31)×10^(-3)mm^2/s,高于恶性组ADC值的(1.72±0.36)×10^(-3)mm^2/s(P<0.05);良性组SIR值为0.58±0.15,高于的恶性组的1.26±0.16(P<0.05),良性组SAR值为0.45±0.36,低于恶性组的0.15±0.07(P<0.05)。结论 DWI信号不能准确鉴别椎体良恶性病变,而ADC值和SIR值、SAR值具有重要的鉴别诊断价值。 Objective To explore the application value of MRI in-phase and opposed-phase (IP/OP) ,apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI) in distinguishing benign and malignant spinal lesions. Methods A total of 80 patients with vertebral compression fractures caused by malignant tumor were enrolled as malignant group, and 80 patients with vertebral compression fractures caused by benign disease as benign group. The patients in both groups received MRI scanning with routine sequence and DWI. And the double-echo technology was used to obtain IP/OP imaging by three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-echo. The characteristics of DWI signals were analyzed in the cases of benign and malignant lesions. The ADC, signal intensity ratio(SIR) and signal attenuation ratio (SAR) were quantitatively determined. Results High, equal, low or mixed signals of DWI sequences were observed in both of benign group and malignant group. No significant difference in the signal change of DWI was observed between two groups( P 〉 0.05 ). The ADC in the benign group was (2.24 ±0.31 ) × 10^- 3 mm2/s,and was higher than that in the malignant group( 1.72±0.36)× 10^-3 mm2/s ( P 〈 0.05 ). The SIR in the benign group was 0.58± 0.15, and was higher than that in the malignant group ( 1.26± 0.16) ( P 〈 0.05 ). The SAR in the benign group was 0.45 ± 0.36, and was lower than that in the malignant group ( 0.15 ±0.07 ) ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion DWI signal can not be used to distinguish benign and malignant spinal lesions of vertebral bodies accurately. But ADC, SIR and SAR are valuable in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions.
出处 《广西医学》 CAS 2016年第1期60-62,共3页 Guangxi Medical Journal
关键词 脊柱疾病 良性 恶性 磁共振成像 弥散加权成像 表观扩散系数 同反相位成像 Spinal lesions,Benign, Malignant, Magnetic resonance imaging, Diffusion-weighted imaging, Apparent diffusion coefficient,In-phase and opposed-phase
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Liu H, Liu Y, Yu T, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of pulmonary lesions [J ]. Eur Radiol,2010,20(4) :807 - 815.
  • 2Sung JK, Jee WH, Jung JY, et al. Differentiation of acute osteoporotic and malignant compression fractures of the spine: use of additive qualitative and quantitative axial diffusionweighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging at 3.0T [ J ]. Radiology, 2014,271 ( 2 ) :488 - 498.
  • 3Arevalo-Perez J, Peck KK, Lyo JK, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant vertebral fractures using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [ J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2015,42 (4) : 1 039 - 1 047.
  • 4Chu S, Karimi S, Peck KK, et al. Measurement of blood per- fusion in spinal metastases with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging:evaluation of tumor response to radiation therapy [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2013,38 (22) :El 418 - E1 424.
  • 5Martel Villagra J, Bueno Horcajadas a, Perez Fermandez E, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating between benign and malignant vertebral lesions:role of diffusion-weighted imaging, inhase/opposed-phase imagingand apparent diffusion coefficient [ J ]. Radiologia, 2015,57 (2) :142 - 149.
  • 6Rohren EM, Kosarek FJ, Helms CA. Discoid lateral meniscus and the frequency of meniscal tears [ J ]. Skeletal Radiol, 2001,30(6) :316 -320.
  • 7Hamimi A, Kassab F, Kazkaz G. Osteoporotic or malignant vertebral fracture? This is the question. What can we do about it? [J]. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med,2015,46( 1 ) :97 - 103.
  • 8何海林,习羽.X线平片与CT诊断脊椎转移瘤的临床对比研究[J].医学综述,2013,19(13):2445-2447. 被引量:8
  • 9Douis H, Jeys L, Grimer R, et al. Is there a role for diffusionweighted MRI ( DWI ) in the diagnosis of central cartilage tumors? [ J ]. Skeletal Radiol,2015,44 (7) :963 - 969.
  • 10万齐,李新春,周嘉璇.MRI扩散加权成像在骨肌系统疾病的应用进展[J].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2013,7(5):87-89. 被引量:8

二级参考文献43

共引文献36

同被引文献60

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部