摘要
目的比较多索茶碱与氨茶碱治疗支气管哮喘的临床疗效。方法选取该科于2013年3月—2014年3月收治的支气管哮喘患者126例作为临床研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各63例。对照组患者在常规治疗的基础上使用氨茶碱,观察组患者在常规治疗的基础上使用多索茶碱。比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果根据比较结果,观察组患者的治疗总有效率为95.24%,明显高于对照组患者的77.78%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);另外,观察组患者的肺功能指标改善情况明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与氨茶碱相比,多索茶碱治疗支气管哮喘的临床疗效更好,值得优先选用。
Objective To compare the clinical effect of doxofylline and aminophylline in treatment of bronchial asthma. Methods From March 2013 to March 2014, 126 patients with bronchial asthma were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 63 cases in each group. Control group patients in the conventional treatment based on the use of aminophylline in the observed groups of patients in the conventional treatment based on the use of doxofylline. To compare the therapeutic effect of the two groups of patients. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 77.78%, significantly higher than that of the control group （P〈0.05）, and the improvement of pulmonary function index of the obser-vation group was significantly better than that of the control group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Compared with aminophylline, bet-ter clinical effect of doxofylline in the treatment of bronchial asthma, is preferred.
出处
《中国卫生产业》
2015年第24期44-45,共2页
China Health Industry
关键词
多索茶碱
氨茶碱
支气管哮喘
疗效
Doxofylline
Aminophylline
Asthma
Curative effect
