摘要
为理解SPS协定下的非歧视要求的内涵,本文深入研究了2015年6月审结的印度禽流感措施案专家组的推理及结论,结果发现SPS协定下的非歧视性要求与科学性要求存在紧密联系,而且WTO争端解决机构没有义务接受某成员方关于对于非疫区地位的自主申明。建议我国政府在今后的相关立法中应注意措辞的灵活性和包容性,为国际合作应对疫情留下可能。
To understand the requirement of non-discrimination report of the India-Agricultural Products Case, which leads in the SPS Agreement, this paper explores the Panel to the following findings：The Non-discrimination requirement is firmly related with the science-based requirement; Dispute Settlement Body is not obligated to accept as conclusive a Member＇s alleged ＂self-declaration＂ of pest- or disease-free areas. To avoid a finding of disguised trade restriction, we government should formulate laws and regulations flexibly to leave the possibility of inter- government corporation.
出处
《中国畜牧杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2016年第4期3-7,共5页
Chinese Journal of Animal Science
关键词
SPS协定
非歧视性要求
印度禽流感措施案
SPS Agreement
requirement of non-discrimination
India-Agricultural products case
