当代中国的科学传播被引量：44

Science Communication in Contemporary China

导出

摘要当代中国的科学传播有三个名称:科普、科技传播和科学传播,分别代表科学传播的三个群体和三种模式。由中国科协所主导的科普是主流和正统,拥有国家主义、功利主义、科学主义三重特征,近20年来有边缘化趋势。科技传播的研究者主要是传播学家,主要关注传播手段和传播效率,与科普理念没有冲突。科学传播的倡导者主要是科学史家和科学哲学家,挑战主流和正统科普的三大意识形态。以北大科学传播中心为标志,形成了中国科学传播的批判学派。三种模式仍然处在剧烈的互动和融合过程之中。 Science communication in contemporary China has three names： Science Popularization （SP）, Science and Technology Communication （STC） and Science Communication （SC）, representing three groups and three modes of science communication. As the mainstream and orthodox, SP, dominated by China Association for Science and Technology （CAST）, has three characteristics： nationalism, utilitarianism and scientism. However, it has gradually been marginalized in the past 20 years to some extent. The main researchers of STC are communication experts, focusing on the means and efficiency of communication. They have no conflict with the idea of SP. The advocates of SC are mainly historians of science and philosophers of science who challenge the three ideologies of traditional SP. Indicated by the Center for Science Communication of Peking University, the Critical School of Science Communication was formed. These three modes are still in the process of intense interaction and integration.

作者吴国盛

机构地区北京大学哲学系

出处《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期1-6,共6页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature

关键词中国科学传播科技传播科学普及 China Science Communication Science and Technology Communication Science Popularization

分类号 N0 [自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1樊洪业.解读‘传统科普’[N].科学时报,2004-1-9.
2Kwok, D. W. Y. Scientism in Chinese Thought, 1900-1950 [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1965.
3Yu-Sheng Lin. The Crisis of Chinese Consciousness: Radical Antitraditionalism in the May FourthEra [M]. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978.
4曾国屏.国家创新系统视野中的科学传播与普及[J].科普研究,2006,1(1):13-18. 被引量：14
5吴国盛.科学史学科建设几点意见[J],自然科学史研究,2000,19(1).
6赵致真.中国科普与新世纪[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2001:96.
7刘华杰.大科学时代的科普理念[N].光明日报,2000-11-02.
8刘华杰.论科普的立场与科学传播的信条[J].自然辩证法研究,2004,20(8):76-80. 被引量：31
9章道义.透视某些‘科普新见’的背后[A].中国科普作家协会主办:科普创作通讯[C],2004,(2-3):9.
10吴国盛.科学传播与科学文化再思考[N].中华读书报,2003-10-29.

二级参考文献20

1[5]Freeman C.Technology Policy and Economic Performance:Lessons from Japan[M].London:Pinter Publishers,1987.
2[6]Edquist C.Systems of Innovation:Technologies,Institutions and Organization[C].London:Pinter Publisher,1997.
3[7]Lundvall,B-A.National Systems of Innovation:Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning[C].London:Pinter Publishers,1992.
4[8]OECD.National Innovation Systems[C].Paris:OECD,1997.
5[11]Nonaka,I.A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation.Organization Science,1994 (1):14-37.
6陈祖甲.哪有科普的立场[N].科学时报,2004—03—26.
7樊洪业.解读“传统科普”[N].科学时报,2004—01—09.
8刘华杰.论科普的三种不同立场[N].科学时报,2004—02—06.
9刘华杰.谈谈“科学传播”的主体结构[N].中华新闻报,2000—07—03.
10史晓雷.对“科学传播立场”的再认识[N].科学时报,2004—03—05.