期刊文献+

多维测评工具聚敛和区分效度的SEM分析——以领悟社会支持量表为例 被引量:49

On Analysis of Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Multidimensional Measurement Tools with the Perceived Social Support Scale as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:以领悟社会支持量表实例,探讨了量表聚敛效度和区分效度的评估方法,为测评工具效度的评估提供一种新的思路.方法:用领悟社会支持量表对1 500名在校高中生进行问卷调查,并计算用于评价聚敛和区分效度的各项指标,如因素负荷量、组合信度、平均方差抽取量、卡方值和相关系数的Bootstrap置信区间.结果:各项目的因素负荷量均大于0.5,各分量表的组合信度均大于0.7,其他支持和朋友支持的相关系数的Bootstrap区间包含1.结论:朋友支持的聚敛效度较好,其他支持和家庭支持的聚敛效度相对较差,但达到了可接受水平;朋友支持与家庭支持的区分效度较好,但其他支持与朋友支持和家庭支持的区分效度均较差,量表的改善可针对项目1和11进行修订. This article deals with the exploration of the evaluation methods of convergent and discriminant validity with an example,in order to provide a new idea for assessing the validity.1500 students have been surveyed with the perceived social support scale.Then,the indicators of convergent and discriminant validity,such as factor loading,average variance extracted,composite reliability,chi-square value and the bootstrap confidence interval of correlation coefficient have been calculated.To all items,the factor loadings are big than 0.5.The composite reliability of all sub-scales are greater than 0.7.The 1is among the bootstrap confidence interval of correlation coefficients of others and friends support.The generalizability coefficient and reliability index were about 0.90.The convergent validity of friends support is good,but the validity of others and family supports are relatively bad.The discriminant validity is good among the friends and family support,but it is relatively poor among others and friends support.We can revise the item 1and 11 for improving the scale.
出处 《西南师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第2期136-140,共5页 Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
关键词 聚敛效度 区分效度 因素负荷 平均抽取量 组合信度 convergent validity discriminant validity factor loading average variance extracted composite reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1刘易斯·艾肯,加里·格罗恩-马纳特.艾肯心理测量与评估[M].张厚粲,赵守盈,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009.
  • 2阿拉坦巴根,刘晓明.高校课堂教学心理契约量表的编制[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(2):267-271. 被引量:12
  • 3冯怡,王秀华,张燕敏,丁钰,孙理.七情评定量表的编制[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2014,28(8):572-577. 被引量:10
  • 4田宝伟,吴九君,郑日昌.大学生挫折应对能力陈述性量表编制及结构探索[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2014,28(2):145-150. 被引量:14
  • 5王孟成,戴晓阳.中文人生意义问卷(C-MLQ)在大学生中的适用性[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2008,16(5):459-461. 被引量:162
  • 6ANDERSON JC, GWRBING D W. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-step Approach [J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1988, 103(3): 411-423.
  • 7BACON D R, SAUER P L, Young M. Composite Reliability in Structural Equations Modeling [J]. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1995, 55(3): 394-406.
  • 8BAGOZZI R P, PHILLIPS L W. Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal [J]. Adminis- trative Science Quarterly, 1982, 27(3): 459-489.
  • 9FORNELL C, LARCKER D F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981, 18(1): 39-50.
  • 10HAIR J F, TATHAM R L, ANDERSON R E, et al. Multivariate Data Analysis(Vol 7) [M]. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2014.

二级参考文献73

共引文献734

同被引文献534

引证文献49

二级引证文献249

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部