摘要
目的比较宫颈息肉传统术式及宫腔镜下电切术两种手术方法的临床疗效。方法选择2011年9月-2013年9月我院收治的宫颈息肉患者64例为对照组,选择2013年10月-2015年10月我院收治的宫颈息肉患者65例为观察组,对照组采用传统摘除方法,观察组采用宫腔镜下宫颈息肉电切术,比较两组术后阴道出血时间及复发率。结果观察组阴道出血时间短于对照组,术后3、6、12个月宫颈息肉复发低于对照组,两组差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论宫腔镜电切术治疗宫颈息肉阴道出血时间短,术后复发率低。
Objective To compare the effect of conventional surgery and hysteroscopic surgery for the treatment of cervical polyp. Methods 64 patients of cervical polyp were collected as control group from September 2011 to September 2013, and 65 patients of cervical polyp were collected as observation group from October 2013 to October 2015 in our hospital. The control group were treated with conventional surgery, and the observation group with hysteroscopic surgery, postoperative vaginal bleeding time and the recurrence rate of the two groups were compared. Results The postoperative vaginal bleeding time and the recurrence rate 3, 6, 12 after operation in observation group was less than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion The treatment of hysteroscopic surgery for cervical polyp could reduce the time of colporrhagia and recurrence rate.
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2016年第5期117-118,共2页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
宫腔镜电切术
宫颈息肉
Hysteroscopic surgery
Cervical polyp
