摘要
"区域研究"是近年来中国人类学界的热门话题之一。将"区域研究"这一研究术语"问题化",回顾现有研究中的问题,探讨其可能的发展方向,可推进人类学生产出对身处时代的深刻洞见。"区域研究"的主流范式注重挖掘地方特殊性,而要走出因缺乏足够的跨学科意识而导致"内卷化"的局面,或可借镜对抗全球宰制力量的世界体系理论、重人本主义关怀的区域史以及注重反思话语的东亚/亚洲论述;与此同时,重温费孝通晚年灵活的思路转换过程,将对超越区域研究"地缘化"的思维惯性有所启发;而将区域作为一个研究范畴去思考,并关注流动与情感这两个有突破潜力的面向,或对推进"多声道"的区域研究不无裨益。
＂Regional studies＂ is widely addressed in Chinese anthropological academia, yet three problems impede the progress of ＂regional studies＂. This article identifies problematic trends in ＂regional studies＂ and proposes possible solutions as a counter-force. The mainstream paradigm in ＂regional studies＂ emphasises the local peculiarity; hence, in order to reverse the ＂involution＂ trend due to lack of adequate interdisciplinary awareness, the＂counter-hegemony＂ world system theory, the＂humanism＂ regional history and the ＂reflexive＂ InterAisa cultural studies serves as inspiration. Also, by reviewing how Fei Xiaotong flexibly transfers between the new phenomena and abstract thinking during his twilight years, we can break out of conventional thinking that merely view region as a geographical concept. ＂Region＂ should not as the single object of theoretical thinking in ＂regional studies＂; thus, by introducing ＂mobility studies＂ and ＂the anthropology of emotions＂ as two creative potential issues, we can produce more insights instead of banalities in this field. Together, we can yield more profound anthropological insights about the very character of the time in which we
出处
《青海民族研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第1期55-60,共6页
Qinghai Journal of Ethnology
基金
中山大学历史人类学研究中心承担的国家社科基金重大项目<清水江文书整理与研究>阶段性成果
批准号:11&ZD096
关键词
区域研究
问题意识
文化研究
流动
情感
Chinese anthropology, regional studies, community studies, rationale-oriented approach, InterAisa cultural studies
