期刊文献+

基于选择实验法的湿地保护区生态补偿政策研究 被引量:35

Study on Eco-compensation Policy Design for Wetland——A Choice Experiment Approach
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究以"国家生态补偿试点"的盐城国家级湿地珍禽保护区作为案例,从生态补偿对象的角度研究了生态补偿的政策设计。根据对保护区附近288户农户的实地调查数据,研究采用选择实验法识别了农户对不同生态补偿政策方案的偏好情况。通过计量分析发现:补偿政策设计中补偿水平、合同年限、退出合同的权利、环境绩效等补偿政策属性显著影响农户参与意愿,其中合同年限与退出权利对参与意愿影响最为显著。基于以上发现,研究讨论了补偿政策设计中不同的属性安排,特别是设置退出权限等措施对盐城生态补偿政策的成本有效性、可持续性及实施效果的潜在影响,为政策设计提供相应的实证基础。文章还计算了各个属性的接受意愿价值,并分析了潜在参与者的个人及家庭特征,为补偿的价格设定提供了相应的参考。 Using Yancheng Rare Bird Nature Reserve as the case study area, this study analyzes farmers' preferences for different attributes to be included in an eco-compensation scheme tar- geting for wetland protection. Based on detailed field survey data of 288 households, this study empirically analyzes this issue based on the choice experiment approach. The results of this study show that: amount of compensation, years of contract, and right to withdraw from the contract have significant effects on farmers' willingness to participate in the eco-compensation scheme. The results also show that the requirement of land sign-up and pesticide reduction by the eco-compensation scheme can significantly reduce farmers' willingness of being enrolled. By calculating the willingness to accept, we find that right to withdraw and years of contract are the most influential attributes. The study suggests that providing trainings and technical sup- port of pesticide use to local farmers has important implications for nature reserve protection. It also suggests that more flexible compensation scheme can increase the sustainability and effi- ciency of eco-compensation scheme compared with traditional eco-compensation scheme. All of these findings have been discussed for the design of compensation scheme with regard to the context of current Chinese wetland and nature reserve protection policy.
出处 《自然资源学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期241-251,共11页 Journal of Natural Resources
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71203223) 国家自然科学基金优秀青年基金项目(71222302) 国家科技支撑项目(2012BAC01B01)~~
关键词 生态补偿设计 农药减量 选择实验方法 eco-compensation design pesticide reduction choice experiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

二级参考文献304

共引文献1029

同被引文献658

引证文献35

二级引证文献384

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部