期刊文献+

《日用化学品安全评价技术创新——替代方法》专题一 国际化学品安全评价动物替代测试法规趋势 被引量:13

Global regulation trend of alternative methods for chemical safety evaluation on animals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 综述了国际化学品和化妆品动物替代测试的法规进展和趋势。重点介绍了在3R运动和体外科学技术的推动下,替代方法在化学品毒性测试中的验证和法规认可现状。讨论了替代技术在急性毒性、皮肤刺激/腐蚀、眼刺激/腐蚀、皮肤致敏、遗传毒性、内分泌干扰等毒理学终点的应用。最后提出了替代方法的发展不仅是法规趋同、市场一体、检测标准协调一致、动物福利认知进步的必然趋势,也是检测技术创新和日化企业应用难得的机遇。 The background and trend of international regulation on alternative methods of toxicity assessment on animals for chemicals and cosmetics were summarized. The current status of standardization, validation and acceptance of alternative methods on chemicals toxicity testing were introduced under the development of 3Rs and in vitro technology. Application of alternative technologies on key toxicology endpoint were discussed including acute toxicity, skin & eye irritation/corrosion, skin sensitization, genetic toxicity and endocrine disruption. Finally, it can be concluded that the alternative is not only an inevitable trend for regulation assimilation, market integration, test standard coordinated and the progress of animal welfare cognitive, it is also a great opportunity for detecting technique innovation and cosmetic enterprise application .
出处 《日用化学品科学》 CAS 2016年第2期11-16,共6页 Detergent & Cosmetics
基金 "十二五"国家科技支撑计划(2011BAI15B03) 广东省科技计划项目(2009B060300013)
关键词 替代法 法规 化学品 法规化妆品动物实验禁令 毒性试验 alternative method regulation chemicals cosmetic animal testing ban toxicity testing
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1MICHAELBALLS.3R和仁慈准则[M].程树军,译北京:科学出版社,2010.
  • 2KREWSKI D, ACOSTA D, ANDERSEN M, et al. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy[J]. Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev, 2010, 13: 51-138.
  • 3Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes[K]. Off J Eur Communities, 2010, L276: 33-79.
  • 4MOORE NP, ANDREW DJ, BJERKE DL, et al. Can acute dermal systemic toxicity tests be replaced with oral tests? A comparison of route-specific systemic toxicity and hazard classifications under the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) [J]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2013, 66(1): 30-37.
  • 5SEIDLE T, PRIETO P, BULGHERONI A. Examining the regulatory value of multi-route mammalian acute systemic toxicity studies[J]. Alternatives to Animal Experimentation, 2011, 28(2): 95-102.
  • 6ROBINSON S, DELONGEAS JL, DONALD E, et al. European pharmaceutical company initiative challenging the regulatory requirement for acute toxicity studies in pharmaceutical drug development[J]. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 2008, 50: 345-352.
  • 7EURL ECVAM status report on the development, validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative methods and approaches[R]. JRC Science and Policy Report, 2015.
  • 8OECD. The Adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitisation initiated by covalent binding to proteins, part 2: use of the AOP to develop chemical categories and integrated assessment and testing approaches[K]. Series on Testing and Assessment No. 168, 2012.
  • 9RAMIREZ T, MEHLING A, KOLLE SN, et al. LuSens: a keratinocyte based ARE reporter gene assay for use in integrated testing strategies for skin sensitization hazard identification [J]. Toxicol In Vitro, 2014, 28(8): 1482-97.
  • 10The SCCS notes of guidance for the testing of cosmetic ingredients and their safety evaluation[K]. 2015.

同被引文献55

引证文献13

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部