摘要
随着著作权产业的发展和大数据贸易时代的到来,著作人身权流转的司法案例和社会现象频频发生,学术界开始为该权利的可流转性寻求理论上的支撑。然而,在传统民法理论中,人身权一直被视为民事主体所不可或缺的部分,针对该权利的流转行为也一向被法律所禁止。著作人身权虽不完全等同于民法上的人身权利,但其作为私权,仍宜将不可流转性作为基本属性。从既有理论缺陷出发,尝试构建著作人身权不可流转理论之框架,既具有现实意义,亦对修订中的《著作权法》草案中有关著作人身权权利行使的制度设计大有裨益。
With the ascendant Copyright Industries and the big date era of commerce, the occurrence of Moral Rights circulation cases shows a significant uptrend throughout all these years. Scholars start to seek for theoretical support for legitimate circulation of Moral Rights. From an orthodox civil law point of view, Rights of the person is considered as an indispensable portion of civil parties. Hence, any act of circulation of Rights of the person is strictly prohibited. Theoretically speaking, Moral Rights does not equal to Rights of person： a prescript in civil law. Yet, as a portion of Rights of the person, the non-circulatory aspect implies in the basic attributes of Moral Rights. By starting with the existing theories and building a theoretic structure of the non-circulation of Moral Rights, not only the realistic meaning but also the under-legislation Moral Rights Law will benefit vastly from the act aforesaid.
出处
《电子知识产权》
2016年第2期41-50,共10页
Electronics Intellectual Property
基金
教育部人文社科一般项目资助,项目名称:知识产权交叉案件合一审判模式的司法公信力研究,课题编号:11YJA820001
关键词
著作人身权
流转
侵权责任限制说
Moral rights： Circulation： Restriction of infrlncrama.t
