期刊文献+

次氯酸钠与酒精消毒对酸蚀过程中牙釉质影响的比较 被引量:1

Comparison of influence in enamel during acid etching etching between sodium hypochlorite and alcohol disinfection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨次氯酸钠与酒精消毒对酸蚀过程中牙釉质的影响,为正畸治疗提供参考。方法:收集离体恒牙60颗,随机分为2组(A和B组),每组各30颗,A组采用5.25%次氯酸钠预处理,B组采用75%酒精预处理;经分组处理后,A和B组再分别随机分为3组(A0、A1、A2和B0、B1、B2组),每组各10颗,分别采用37%磷酸酸蚀0、15和30s。取离体乳牙40颗,随机分为2组(C和D组),每组各20颗,C组采用5.25%次氯酸钠预处理,D组采用75%酒精预处理;经分组处理后,C和D组再分别随机分为2组(C0、C1组和D0、D1组),每组各10颗,分别采用37%磷酸酸蚀0和30s。超声清洗离体牙,扫描电镜(SEM)观察釉质微观形态,检测各组釉质表面孔隙直径,测量各组样品抗剪切力强度,并进行组间比较。结果:各组釉质表面孔隙直径比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。恒牙实验组中A2组牙釉质孔隙直径最大(P<0.01),表面蛋白残留较少,釉质暴露充分,且抗剪切力强度最大(P<0.01);B1组孔隙直径最小(P<0.01),且表面蛋白残留较多,抗剪切力强度最小(P<0.01)。乳牙实验组中C1组釉质孔隙直径最大(P<0.01),且表面残留蛋白较少,抗剪切力强度最大(P<0.01);D1组釉质孔隙直径最小(P<0.01),且表面蛋白残留较多,抗剪切力强度最小(P<0.01)。结论:与常用酒精消毒方法比较,采用5.25%次氯酸钠预处理牙釉质30s可明显增加釉质表面粗糙度和清洁度,并增强正畸托槽粘结强度。 Objective:To investigate the influence of sodium hypochlorite and alcohol disinfection in the enamel during acid etching,and to provide reference for the orthodontic treatment.Methods:Sixty extracted permanent teeth were selected and randomly divided into two groups(group A and group B),with 30 teeth in each group.The teeth in group A were pretreated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and the teeth in group B were pretreated with75% alcohol.After pretreatment,group A and group B were randomly divided into three groups(groups A0,A1,A2,B0,B1,and B2),with 10 teeth in each group and the teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 0,15 and 30 s.Forty extracted deciduous teeth were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups(group C and D),with20 teeth in each group.In group C,the teeth were pretreated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite;in group D,the teeth were pretreated with 75% alcohol.After pretreatment,group C and group D were randomly divided into two groups(groups C0,C1,D0,and D1)with 10 teeth in each group,and the teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 0 and 30 s.The morphology of enamel was observed by scanning electron microscope(SEM)after the extracted teeth were cleaned with ultrasound;the pore diameters of enamel surface were detected and the shear strength of samples in each group was detected.Results:The differences in pore diameters between various groups were statistically significant(P<0.01).In the permanent teeth test group,the pore diameter in group A2 was the maximum(P<0.01),the surface protein residues were less,and the enamel was fully exposed,and the shear strength was the highest(P<0.01).The pore diameter in group B1 was the minimum(P<0.01),the surface protein residues were more,and the shear strength was the lowest(P<0.01).In the deciduous teeth test group,the pore diameter in group C1 was the maximum(P<0.01),the surface protein residues were less,and the shear strength was the highest(P<0.01).The pore diameter in group D1 was the minimum,and the surface protein residues were more,and the shear strength was the lowest(P<0.01).Conclusion:Compared with the traditional alcohol disinfection method,pretreatment of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in tooth enamel for 30 scan significantly increase the surface roughness and cleanliness of enamel,and enhance the shear strength of orthodontic bracket.
作者 公柏娟 罗淞元 GONG Baijuan;LUO Songyuan(Department of Orthodontics,Stomatology Hospital,Jilin University,Changchun 130021,China)
出处 《吉林大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第2期370-375,共6页 Journal of Jilin University:Medicine Edition
基金 国家科技部重点研发项目资助课题(2016YFC1102804)
关键词 次氯酸钠 酸蚀 牙釉质 扫描电子显微镜 sodium hypochlorite acid etching enamel scanning electron microscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献127

  • 1房伯君,马丽,杨亚囡.不同粘接剂重复粘接正畸托槽的剪切强度研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2004,22(5):435-436. 被引量:7
  • 2石东晓,陈杰,刘王君.喷砂技术对牙釉质和正畸托槽间黏结强度的影响[J].广东牙病防治,2007,15(4):155-157. 被引量:6
  • 3Roberto Justus.Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontiv adhesives[J].American Journal of Orthodontics&Dentofacial Orthopedics,1999,116(6):616-620.
  • 4Espinosa R,Valencia R,Uribe M,et al.Enamel deproteinization and its effect on acid etching:an invitro study[J].J Clin Pediatr Dent,2008,33(1):13-19.
  • 5恒昌 王鸿一.探讨釉质粘结机制中几个问题.中华口腔医学杂志,1981,:6-9.
  • 6Tavas MA,Watts DC.Bonding of orthodontic brackets by trans-illumination of a light activated conposite;an in-vitro sutdy[J].British Journal of orthodonties,1979,6(4):207-208.
  • 7Fox NA,McCabe JF,Bucklet JG.A Critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics[J].British Journal of Orthodontics,1994.21(1):33-43.
  • 8Ewoldsen N, Demke R S. A review of orthodontic cements and adhesives [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2001, 120(1) :45-48.
  • 9Nigel A. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics[J]. Br J Orthod, 1994, 21(1) :33-34.
  • 10Ericsson I, Thilander B, Lindle J, et al. The effect of orthodontic tilting movements on the periodontal tissues of infected and non-infected dentitions in dogs [J]. J Clin Periodont, 1977, 4(4) :278-293.

共引文献44

同被引文献17

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部