期刊文献+

“化学实验教学论”课程中论证教学的探索——以喷泉系列实验为例 被引量:1

Argumentation Teaching in Chemistry Didactics Experiment Course with Example of Fountain Experiment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在职前教师教育类课程"化学实验教学论"中,以喷泉相关实验为例,设计论证问题和评价细则,开展论证教学的实践和探索。研究细致分析并揭示了职前教师在论证建构中存在的理由不充分,逻辑推理欠严密;忽略前提条件或特定背景;多采用直觉启发式,少采用系统分析式等问题。这为提高职前教师科学论证能力提供了参考。 This paper concentrated on pre-service teachers' argumentation in the curriculum of chemistry didactics experiment and developed argumentation questions and the evaluation rules based on the fountain experiments. The results revealed problems existing in pre-service teachers' arguments, including insufficient reasons to support their views, lack of strict logical reasoning, ignoring preconditions or specific background, and using less system analysis. These find- ings can provide a reference for improving the ability of scientific argumentation of pre-service teachers.
作者 罗秀玲 肖信
出处 《化学教育》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第6期46-49,共4页 Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
关键词 论证教学 职前教师 化学实验 argumentation teaching pre-serviee teacher chemistry experiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献66

  • 1高华,余嘉元.推理过程中非理性现象的新解释[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2006(4):106-110. 被引量:4
  • 2Cleeremans, A., & Jimenez, L. (2002). Implicit learning and A graded, dynamical perspective. In: French R M. & Cleeremans, A. (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical and computational consensus in the making (1-40). Hove: Psychology Press.
  • 3Epstein, S., Pacini, R. (1999). dual-process theories from Some basic issues regarding the perspective of cognitive --experiential theory. In Chaiken, S., Trope, Y., (Editors), Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, Guilford Press, New York, 462-482.
  • 4Evans, J. S. B. T. (1996). Deciding before you think: Relevance and reasoning in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 223-240.
  • 5Evans, J. S. B. T. & West, R. F. (2002). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726.
  • 6Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006). The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 13, 378-395.
  • 7Evans, J. S. B. T. (2007). On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 12, 123-145.
  • 8Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition. Annual Review Psychology, 59, 255-278.
  • 9Frenseh, P. A., Buchner, A., & Lin, J. (1994). Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transition in the presence and absence of a distraction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 567-584.
  • 10Gigerenzer, O., & Regier, T. (1996). How do we tell an association from a rule: Comment on Sloman. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 23-26.

共引文献163

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部