期刊文献+

上肢手术病人超声引导锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的效果观察 被引量:7

Effect of Ultrasound Guiding Brachial Plexus Nerve Blocking in Upper Limb Surgery Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探究上肢手术病人使用超声引导锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的效果.方法:选取2013年1月-2015年1月来某院就诊的90例行上肢手术患者为研究对象,将其分成3组,分别为超导声1组,超导声2组与神经刺激器组.使用不同方式对患者进行麻醉阻滞,观察患者感觉阻滞效果、麻醉效果和并发症发生情况.结果:神经刺激器组有19例感觉阻滞完善,剩余11例感觉阻滞不全.超导声1组与超导声2组所有患者阻滞完善,组间数据存在统计学意义,P 〈0.05;超导声1组与2组麻醉效果无统计学意义存在,P 〉0.05;和神经刺激器组相比,超导声1组与超导声2组麻醉效果要好,组间数据存在统计学意义,P 〈0.05.结论:对于上肢手术患者,使用超声引导锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞,能够取得满意效果,值得推广应用. Objective:To explore the effect of ultrasound guiding brachial plexus nerve blocking in upper limb surgery patients.Methods:Select 120 patients received upper limb surgery from January 2013 to Januar-y 2015 in a hospital as the research object,divide them into three groups,superconducting sound group 1, superconducting sound group 2 and nerve stimulator group.Using different methods to do sensory block to patients and observe the effect of sensory block,the effect of anesthesia and the complications of the patients with anesthesia.Results:Nerve stimulator group had 1 9 cases of perfect sensory block,the remaining 1 1 ca-ses felt incomplete block.All the patients in superconducting sound group 1 and superconducting sound group 2 were perfect sensory block,data between the groups had statistical significance,P<0.05.There was no significant difference in anesthesia effect between superconducting sound group 1 and superconducting sound group 2,P>0.05.The anesthesia effect of superconducting sound group 1 and superconducting sound group were better than that of nerve stimulator group,the difference was statistically significant,P<0.05.Conclu-sion:For patients with upper limb surgery,using ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blocking can achieve satisfactory effect,which is worth popularization and application.
出处 《数理医药学杂志》 2016年第4期485-487,共3页 Journal of Mathematical Medicine
关键词 超声检查 介入性 臂丛 神经传导阻滞 ultrasonography interventional brachial plexus nerve block
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献16

  • 1Hanumanthaiah D, Vaidiyanathan S, Garstka M, et al. Ultra- sound guided supraclavicular block [ J ]. Med Ultrason, 2013, 15 ( 3 ) :224-229.
  • 2Dixon WJ,Massey FJ. Introduction to statistical analysis[ M]. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993:428-430.
  • 3Vermeylert K, Eagelen S, Sermeus L, et al. Supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks:review and current practice [ J ]. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg ,2012,63 ( 1 ) : 15-21.
  • 4Roy M, Nadeau MJ, Cote D, et al. Comparison of a single-or double-injection technique for ultrasound-guided supraclavicu- lar block: a prospective, randomized, blinded controlled study [ J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2012,37( 1 ) :55-59.
  • 5Iwata T, Nakahashi K, Inoue S, et al. Low-dose ropivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus block combined with general anesthesia for successful postoperative analgesia:A case series [ J]. Saudi J Anaesth ,2013,7 (1) :37-39.
  • 6Flohr-Madsen S, Ytrebs LM, Kregnes .S, et al. Minimum effec- tive volume of ropivacaine 7. 5 mg/ml for an ultrasound- guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block [ J ]. Acta Anaes- thesiol Scand,2013,57(4) :495-501.
  • 7Arab SA, Alharbi MK, Nada EM, et al. Ultrasound-guided su- praclavicular brachial plexus block: single versus triple injec- tion technique for upper limb arteriovenous access surgery [J]. Anesth Analg,2014,118(5) :1120-1125.
  • 8Gupta PK, Hopkins PM. Effect of concentration of local anaes- thetic solution on the ED of bupivacaine for supraclavicular bra- chial plexus block [J].Br J Anaesth, 2013,111 ( 2 ) :293-296.
  • 9Pavicic Saric J, Vidjak V, Tomulic K, et al. Effects of age on minimum effective volume of local anesthetic for ultrasound- guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block [ J ]. Acta Anaes- thesiol Scand,2013,57(6) :761-766.
  • 10叶伟光,王天龙.低浓度罗哌卡因用于老年患者超声引导肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞的半数有效剂量研究[J].北京医学,2012,34(8):654-655. 被引量:8

共引文献10

同被引文献47

引证文献7

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部