期刊文献+

无花果及其果酒挥发性成分的研究 被引量:21

Research of volatile compounds of figs and fig wine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该研究以无花果为原材料,发酵酿造无花果酒,并对无花果及其果酒的品质进行了评价分析。研制的无花果酒的总酸含量0.507 g/100 mL、可溶性固形物7.50 g/100 mL、酒精度8.5%vol、pH 4.09,其理化指标均符合果酒国家标准。采用GC-MS联用仪、电子鼻和感官评价相结合的方法对无花果及其果酒的风味成分进行检测和评价。结果表明,无花果及其自制果酒中共检测出41种挥发性成分,无花果中检测出28种,自制果酒中检测出21种,除乙醇外,其主要挥发性成分分别为苯甲醛(27.9%)和苯乙醇(19.6%)。共有成分为8种,同时电子鼻检测结果表明,与美餐乐无花果酒相比,自制无花果酒风味更接近于无花果原有风味。自制无花果酒的感官评价总分值与美餐乐无花果酒相差不大,其可接受性高,风格独特,典型优雅。 Using the fig as raw material, the fig wine was brewed, and the quality of fig and fig wine was evaluated and analyzed. The physicochemi- cal indexes of total acid content (0.507 g/100 mL), soluble solid (7.50 g/100 ml), alcohol content (8.5%vol) and pH (4.09) of the fig wine all met the Chinese national standard. The flavor of fig and fig wine was detected and evaluated by GC-MS, electronic nose and sensory evaluation method. The results showed that 41 kinds of volatile compounds were identified, and 28 and 21 volatile components were detected in the fig and homemade fig wine, respectively. In addition to ethanol, benzene formaldehyde (27.9%) and benzene ethanol (19.6%) were the main volatile components. Eight kinds of volatile components were detected in both fig and homemade fig wine, and the electronic nose detection results showed that compared with the Meicanle fig wine, the flavor of homemade fig wine was closer to the fig original wine, and its sensory evaluation score values were no significant difference, which had high acceptability, tmique style and classic elegance.
出处 《中国酿造》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第3期98-103,共6页 China Brewing
基金 现代农业产业技术体系专项资金资助(CARS-26) 北京市农林科学院科技创新能力建设专项新学科培养(KJCX20140204 & KJCX20140111-21) 果蔬农产品保鲜与加工北京市重点实验室(Z141105004414037)
关键词 无花果 气相色谱-质谱联用 电子鼻 感官评价 挥发性成分 fig GC-MS electronic nose sensory evaluation volatile compounds
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1BAROLO M I, NATHALIE R M, LOPEZ S N, et al. Ficus carica L. (Moraceae): An ancient source of food and health[J]. Food Chem, 2014 (164): 119-127.
  • 2王琳,岳田利.发酵型无花果酒酿造工艺研究[J].中国酿造,2005,24(10):59-62. 被引量:9
  • 3傅若农.色谱分析概论[M].北京:化学工业出版社,1999.9.
  • 4QIN Z H, PANG X L, CHEN D, et al. Evaluation of Chinese tea by theelectronic nose and gas chromatographymass spectrometry: Correlation with sensory properties and classification according to grade level [J]. Food Res Int, 2013, 53(2): 864-874.
  • 5TIKK K, HAUGEN J, ANDERSEN H, et al, Monitoring of wanned over flavour in pork using the electronic nosecorrelation to sensory attributes and secondary lipid oxidation products[J]. Meat Sci, 2008, 80(4): 1254- 1263.
  • 6HANSEN T, PETERSEN M, BYRNE D. Sensory based quality control utilising an electronic nose and GCMS analyses to predict endproduct quality from raw materials[J]. Meat Sci, 2005, 69(4): 621 -634.
  • 7Q1U S S, WANG J, GAOL P. Qualification and quantisation of processed strawberry juice based on electronic nose and tongue[J]. LWTFood Sei Technol, 2015, 60(10): 115-123.
  • 8REN J N, TAI Y N, DONG MAN, et al. Characterisation of free and bound volatile compounds from six different varieties of citruS fi'uits [J]. Food Chem, 2015, 185(8): 25-32.
  • 9周春丽,刘伟,陈冬,赵婧,张明,张晓阳,李全宏.基于电子鼻与SPME-GC-MS法分析不同南瓜品种中的挥发性风味物质[J].现代食品科技,2015,31(7):293-301. 被引量:18
  • 10OLIVEIRA A P. Luis S, PAULA G D P, et al. Volatile profiling of Ficus carica varieties by HSSPME and GCITMS[J]. Food Chem, 2010, 12 (3): 548-557.

二级参考文献61

共引文献142

同被引文献248

引证文献21

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部