中日贸易隐含碳失衡研究被引量：15

Imbalance in the carbon emissions embodied in Sino-Japan trade

导出

摘要全球气候变化背景下,由贸易隐含碳失衡导致的"碳泄漏"问题引发了世界各国的普遍关注。本文利用非竞争型投入产出表,构建贸易隐含碳失衡模型,对2000-2011年中日贸易隐含碳失衡规模进行测算。结果显示:1中国各行业完全碳排放系数均高于日本,并且绝大多数行业差距巨大;2总体上,虽然中国处于对日贸易的逆差方,但是在贸易隐含碳方面却一直处于顺差地位,即中国同时处于对日贸易及贸易隐含碳的"双失衡"局面;3从行业来看,中国各行业对日贸易隐含碳均处于失衡状态。其中,纺织业、电气机械/光学设备制造业贸易隐含碳失衡规模最大。在此基础上,采用SDA法建立因素分解模型,对中日贸易隐含碳失衡变化的影响因素进行分析。结果表明,出口规模、中国中间投入结构效应是推动中日贸易隐含碳失衡规模进一步扩大的主要因素,而中国碳排放强度和进口规模效应则主要起到抑制作用。因此,中国应加大推广低碳生产技术力度,降低生产的碳排放强度;同时优化生产以及贸易结构,以缓解中日贸易隐含碳失衡,促进对外贸易及环境保护的协调发展。 The issue of＂carbon leakage＂caused by imbalance of carbon emissions embodied in trade draws widespread attention of the world under the background of climate change.This paper establishes a model of imbalance of carbon emissions embodied in bilateral trade and calculates the imbalance of carbon emissions embodied in Sino- Japan trade using a noncompetitive input- output table for 2001 to 2011. We found that the complete carbon emission coefficient of each sector in China is higher than that of Japan,with rather big differences between the two countries. China has maintained a surplus of carbon emissions via Sino-Japan trade,though it acts as a deficit trader in general. As a consequence,China has been in a situation of‘double imbalance＇in both trade value and carbon emissions embodied in trade at the same time;（3）China performs as a surplus country of carbon emissions embodied in Sino- Japan trade in each sector,and textile,electrical and optical equipments have the largest imbalance scale of carbon emissions embodied in bilateral trade among all sectors. SDA was used to decompose the effects that influence the change in imbalance in carbon emission embodied in Sino- Japan trade. China＇s export scale and intermediate input structure significantly drive the increase in the imbalance in carbon emissions embodied in bilateral trade,while China＇s carbon intensity and import scale plays the opposite role,i.e. eliminating the rise in carbon emissions embodied in Sino-Japan trade.Therefore,greater efforts are needed to improve low- carbon technology and decrease carbon emission intensity in the manufacturing procedure,and the production and trade structure should be optimized to effectively alleviate the imbalance in carbon emissions embodied in China＇s foreign trade to promote the coordination of foreign trade and environmental protection.

作者马晶梅王新影贾红宇

机构地区哈尔滨理工大学经济学院

出处《资源科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期523-533,共11页 Resources Science

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71303071)

关键词贸易隐含碳失衡碳排放强度 MRIO模型 SDA法中国日本 carbon emissions embodied in trade imbalance carbon emission intensity MRIO model SDA China Japan

分类号 F752.7 [经济管理—国际贸易] X196 [环境科学与工程—环境科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献18

1Machado G, Schaeffer R, Worrell E. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: An input-output approach[J]. Ecological Economics, 2001,39 (3) : 409-424.
2Wang T, Watson J. Who owns China' s carbon emissions[J]. Tyndall Centre Briefing Note, 2007, (23) : 1-7.
3Lin B, Sun C. Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in internationaltrade of china[J]. Energy Policy, 2010,38 ( 1 ) : 613-621.
4Shui B, Harriss R C. The role of CO2 embodiment US-Chlna trade [J]. Energy Policy, 2006,34 ( 18 ) : 4063-4068.
5Aekerman F, Ishikawa M, Suga M. The carbon content of Japan- US trade[J]. Energy Policy, 2007,35 (9):4455-4462.
6Ahmad N, Wyekoff A. Carbon Dioxide Emissions Embodied in International Trade of Goods[R]. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2003.
7Chen Z M, Chen G Q. Embodied carbon dioxide emission at supra- national scale : A coalition analysis for G7, BRIC, and the rest of the world[J]. Energy Policy, 2011,39 (5) : 2899-2909.
8闫云凤,赵忠秀,王苒.基于MRIO模型的中国对外贸易隐含碳及排放责任研究[J].世界经济研究,2013(6):54-58. 被引量：50
9刘俊伶,王克,邹骥.基于MRIO模型的全球贸易内涵碳流向分析[J].世界经济研究,2014(6):43-48. 被引量：8
10赵玉焕,王淞.基于技术异质性的中日贸易隐含碳测算及分析[J].北京理工大学学报（社会科学版）,2014,16(1):12-18. 被引量：33

二级参考文献113

1李景华.SDA模型的加权平均分解法及在中国第三产业经济发展分析中的应用[J].系统工程,2004,22(9):69-73. 被引量：67
2Baiocchi, G. , Minx, J. C.. Understanding changes in the UK's CO2 emissions : A global perspective [ J ]. Environmen- tal Science & Technology,2010(44) :1177-1184.
3Chen, Z. M, Chen, G, Q.. Embodied carbon dioxide emission at supra-national scale: A coalition analysis for G7, BRIC, and the rest of the world[J]. Energy Policy, 2011 (59) : 2899 -2909.
4Dietzenbacher E. , Pei J. , Yang C.. Trade, Production Frag- mentation, and China's Carbon Dioxide Emissions[ J]. Jour- nal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2012 (64) : 88-101.
5Du, H. , et al.. CO2 emissions embodied in China-US trade: Input-output analysis based on the emergy/dollar ratio [ J ]. Energy Policy, 2011 (39) :5980-5987.
6Davis, S. J. ,Caldeira, K.. Consumption-based accounting of COz emissions[ J]. PNAS ,2010,107 ( 12 ) :5687-5692.
7Liu, X. et al.. Analyses of CO2 emissions embodied in Japan- China trade[J]. Energy Policy,2010(38) :1510-1518.
8Peters G. P., Minx J. C., Weber C. L., Edenhoferc O.. Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008[ J]. PNAS, 2011,108(21 ) :8903-8908.
9Weber, C. L. , Peters, G. P.. Climate change policy and in- ternational trade: policy considerations in the US[ J]. Energy Policy ,2009,37 (2) :432-440.
10Yan Y. F. , Yang L. K.. China's Foreign Trade and Climate Change: A Case Study of CO2 Emissions[J]. Energy Policy, 2010(38) :350-356.