期刊文献+

司法责任制若干问题之探讨 被引量:54

Discussion on the Issues of Judicial Liability System
原文传递
导出
摘要 在新一轮司法改革中,司法责任制被置于一个基础性的地位,被称之为改革的"牛鼻子"。构建和完善司法责任制,是司法公正的重要保障,是权责统一原则的必然要求,也是中西方司法文明共同的经验汇集。司法责任制以司法独立为前提,以提高司法职业待遇为保障,是一个价值多元化的责任制度。在进行制度构建时,应当遵循司法规律与中国实际相结合之指导原则,在司法独立和司法责任之间寻求适当的平衡。还应当坚持主、客观相结合的基本原则,在范围上明确哪些行为不属于追责情形,在时效上正确理解"终身"的相对性,防止司法责任制适用的扩大化和任意化。在适用程序上,应当从责任承担形式、责任追究主体和责任追究程序三个方面构建和完善司法责任制。 The judicial liability system is placed on the basic position of new judicial reform, which is called as 'cow's nose' of the Reform. To establish and improve judicial liability system is an important guarantee of justice, and also an essential requirement for integration of power and responsibility as well as a corpus of common experiences of China and western judicial culture. The judicial liability system is a system of value diversities with judicialindependence as its prerequisite, improvement of judicial occupational treatment as its guarantee. In the establishment of the system, we should follow the guidance principle of combining the judicial rule with China's reality and keep an adequate balance between judicial independence and judicial liability. Besides, we should insist on the principle of combining subjectivity and objectivity, make clear he relativity of 'lifelong' and the conducts out of liability so as to avoid any exaggeration and arbitration in the application of judicial liability system. In the application procedure, the system should be established and improved in three aspects: undertaking form of liability, subject and procedure of liability prosecution.
出处 《中国政法大学学报》 CSSCI 2016年第2期31-41,158-159,共11页 Journal Of CUPL
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1《以提高司法公信力为根本尺度坚定不移深化司法体制改革》,《人民日报》2015年3月26日,第01版.
  • 2孟建柱.《切实提高政法机关服务大局的能力和水平》,载新华网http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-01/21/c_1114078733.htm,最后访问日期:2016年1月23日.
  • 3《荀子·王制》,北京燕山出版社,1995年.
  • 4Alan Watson,The Digest of Justinian, translated by Chacles Henry Monro, Volume I, Cambridge University Press, 1904, p.3.
  • 5陈光中.坚持程序公正与实体公正并重之我见——以刑事司法为视角[J].国家检察官学院学报,2007,15(2):3-6. 被引量:26
  • 6汉斯·凯尔逊.《法律和国家》,雷崧松译,台湾岩松出版社1978年版,第80页.
  • 7陈光中.《中国古代的法庭审判》,载《陈光中法学文集》,中国法制出版社,2000年版,第185页.
  • 8巩富文.唐代法官出入人罪的责任制度探析[J].政治与法律,1993(1):35-39. 被引量:3
  • 9《贞观政要·政体》.
  • 10美国《宪法》第2条第4款.

二级参考文献54

  • 1杨廷福.论中国古代法制建设[J].学习与探索,1981(2):4-14. 被引量:4
  • 2谭世贵.论司法独立[J].政法论坛,1997,15(1):27-35. 被引量:53
  • 3葛维宝,葛明珍,梅江中.法院的独立与责任[J].环球法律评论,2002,24(122):7-16. 被引量:21
  • 4quoted from Sarnbhav N Sankar, Disciplining the Professional Judge, 88 California Law Review 1233,1241 (July 2000).
  • 5Nixon v. United States,113 S Ct. 732, (1993).
  • 6Molly McDonough, Bench Battle Become Vocal , 89 ABA Journal, 20 (May 2003).
  • 7Peter Ryan, Cousels, Councils and Lunch: Preventing Abuse of the Power to Appoint Independent Counsels, 144 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2537 ( June 96).
  • 8Mark Hansen ,Judicial Tightrope, 83 ABA Journal 105 (April 97).
  • 9Model Code of Judicial Conduct, 2000 Edition, Cannon 2A, Commentary.
  • 10Leslie W Abramson, Appearance of Impropriety: Deciding When a Judge' s Impartiality' Might Resonable Be Questioned', 14 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 55 ( Fall 2000).

共引文献298

同被引文献671

二级引证文献204

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部