期刊文献+

腹腔镜治疗直肠癌的效果和预后的Meta分析 被引量:2

Effects and Clinical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Operation for Rectal Cancer:A Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价腹腔镜治疗直肠癌的效果和预后。方法检索"Pub Med""Embase""Cochrane Library"等数据库2009年1月至2014年6月发表的腹腔镜治疗直肠癌的相关文献,提取有关临床效果和预后,对符合质量标准的随机对照试验进行Meta分析。结果共纳入文献10篇,病例总数为2097例,其中行腹腔镜手术1056例,行传统开腹手术1041例。与传统开腹手术治疗直肠癌相比,腹腔镜手术术中出血量减少(WMD=-123.12,95%CI-197.04^-67.42,P<0.0001)、术后住院时间缩短(WMD=-3.12,95%CI-3.49^-2.75,P<0.00001)、术后并发症发生率降低(OR=0.45,95%CI 0.27~0.76,P=0.0003),但手术时间显著增加(WMD=47.36,95%CI 34.55~60.32,P<0.0001)。腹腔镜手术与开腹手术淋巴结清扫数目(WMD=-0.70,95%CI-1.70~0.20,P=0.560)、环周切缘阳性率(OR=0.45,95%CI 0.27~0.76,P=0.265)和术后5年存活率(OR=0.45,95%CI 0.27~0.76,P=0.067)比较,差异无统计学意义。结论腹腔镜治疗直肠癌术中出血量少、术后住院时间短,并发症发生率低,淋巴结清扫数目、环周切缘阳性率和术后的存活率与传统开腹手术无明显差别,可作为治疗直肠癌的常规术式。 Objective To evaluate effects and outcomes of laparoscopic operation for rectal cancer.Methods Searches were performed for randomized controlled trials about laparoscopic treatment rectal cancer among electronic databases( Pub Med,Embase,Cochrane Library) from Jan. 2009 to Jun. 2014. The clinical effects and outcomes were extracted,and meta-analysis was conducted on eligible randomized controlled trial. Results Altogether 10 clinical controlled studies were finally included. The total number of patients was 1056 patients received Laparoscopic resection and 1041 received open resection. Compared with open resection,the blood loss( WMD =- 123. 12,95% CI- 197. 04-- 67. 42,P 〈0. 0001),length of hospital stays( WMD =- 3. 12,95% CI- 3. 49-- 2. 75,P 〈0. 00001) and rate of postoperative complications( OR = 0. 45,95% CI 0. 27-0. 76,P = 0. 0003) were lower in LR,but the operative time was increased( WMD = 47. 36,95% CI 34. 55-60. 32,P 〈0. 0001). There were no significant differences in harvested lymph nodes( WMD =- 0. 70,95% CI- 1. 70-0. 20,P = 0. 560),positive rate of circumferential resection margin( OR = 0. 45,95% CI 0. 27-0. 76,P = 0. 265) and 5-year overall survival rate( OR =0. 45,95% CI 0. 27-0. 76,P = 0. 067) between Laparoscopic resection and OR. Conclusion Laparoscopic operation has less blood loss,shorter length of hospital stays and lower postoperative complications,while there were no significant differences from traditional laparotomy in number of dissected lymph node,positive rate of circumferential resection margin and 5-year overall survival rate,and can be used as a routine surgery approach for treatment of rectal cancer.
出处 《医学综述》 2016年第6期1180-1185,共6页 Medical Recapitulate
关键词 直肠癌 腹腔镜 预后 META分析 Rectal cancer Laparoscopy Prognosis Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Jemal A,Siegel R,Xu J,et al.Cancer statistics,2010[J].Ca Cancer J Clin,2010,60(5):277-300.
  • 2王宁,孙婷婷,郑荣寿,张思维,陈万青.中国2009年结直肠癌发病和死亡资料分析[J].中国肿瘤,2013,22(7):515-520. 被引量:169
  • 3覃忠卫.腹腔镜直肠癌手术的研究进展[J].右江民族医学院学报,2014,36(2):265-266. 被引量:3
  • 4Ng SS,Leung KL,Lee JF,et al.Long-term moribidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer:ten-year-results of a prospective,randomized trial[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2009,52(4):558-566.
  • 5章佩,曾剑.腹腔镜微创手术治疗直肠癌疗效分析[J].中国医药指南,2009,7(15):103-105. 被引量:4
  • 6Lujan J,Valero G,Hernandez Q,et al.Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer[J].Br J Surg,2009,96(12):982-989.
  • 7Law WL,Poon JT,Fan JK,et al.Comparison of outcome of pen and laparscopic resection for stageⅡand stageⅢrectal cancer[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2009,16(6):1488-1493.
  • 8Kang SB,Park JW,Jeong SY,et al.Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(COREAN trial):short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2010,11(7):637-645.
  • 9Jayne DG,Thorpe HC,Copeland J,et al.Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer[J].Br J Surg,2010,97(11):1638-1645.
  • 10Liang X,Hou S,Liu H,et al.Effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic resection versus open surgery in patients with rectal cancer:a randomized,controlled trial from China[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2011,21(5):381-385.

二级参考文献134

共引文献313

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部