期刊文献+

唐写本《说文·木部》残卷“一曰”之训解研究

The Explanation Research of One Way of Saying about the Remnant Volume of Manuscript of Shuo Wen Jie Zi: Mu Bu in Tang Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《说文》大小徐本"一曰"别义说解常受诟病。本文通过逐一对比研究,发现《说文》最早残写本——唐写本《木部》残卷与大小徐本《木部》对应字的正训与"一曰"之别义训解基本相同,说明唐写本与大小徐本总体保存了许书原貌,且有互补,毋庸质疑。 In two different editions of Shoo Wen Jie Zi explained by Xu Xuan ( Da Xu) and Xu Kai ( Xiao Xu) , their different explanations about have long provoked intense argumentation. Through the comparison and analysis of words one by one, this paper finds that the right explanation about the eorresponding words between the remnant volumes of manuscript of Shuo Wen Jie Zi: Mu Bu in Tang Dynasty-- the earliest remnant volume and Xu Xuan and Xu Kai are similar with another way of saying about explanation, which demonstrates the editions of manuscript in Tang Dynasty and the editions explained by Xu Xuan and Xu Kai fundamentally keep the original appearance of Shuo Wen Jie Zi written by Xu Shen and it is evident that different editions are complementary.
作者 梁光华
出处 《黔南民族师范学院学报》 2016年第1期1-5,10,共6页 Journal of Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities
关键词 唐写本《说文·木部》 一曰 训解 研究 Manuscript of Shuo Wen fie Zi : Mu Bu in Tang Dynasty one way of saying explanation research
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1唐写本.说文解字·木部残卷及清莫友芝唐写本说文解字木部笺异//黔南丛书(第3集)[C].贵阳:贵阳文通书居,民国14年.
  • 2段玉裁.说文解字[M].徐铉等校订.北京:中华书局.1979.
  • 3徐锴.说文解字系传[M].北京:中华书局,1987..
  • 4顾野王.玉篇[M].北京:中华书局,1987.
  • 5.二十五史[M].上海:上海书店,1986..
  • 6.十三经注疏[M].北京:中华书局,1980..
  • 7周祖谟.方言校笺[M].北京:中华书局,1993..
  • 8段玉裁.说文解字注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1981..
  • 9王筠.说文释例[M].北京:北京市中国书店,1983.
  • 10丁福保.说文解字诂林[M].北京:中华书局,1988..

共引文献1020

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部