期刊文献+

TPP商品和服务贸易自由化的经济效果分析 被引量:8

Economic Effect Analysis of Merchandise and Services Trade Liberalization of TPP
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文运用可计算一般均衡模型,结合TPP公布文本中对商品和服务贸易自由化措施对TPP的经济效果进行评估,同时比较分析了TPP条件下RCEP和亚太自贸区商品贸易自由化的经济效果。结果表明,TPP的发展中成员在商贸自由化中获得的相对收益较大,发达成员则在服贸自由化中相对收益更大;TPP的商品和服务贸易自由化会对其他APEC成员造成负面冲击;东亚国家可以通过RCEP来化解TPP的冲击;亚太自贸区更能代表多数APEC成员的利益。 This paper evaluates the economic effects of merchandise trade liberalization and service trade lib- eralization performed by TPP using CGE model incorporated with the protocols of TPP. This paper also com- pares the economic effects of merchandise trade liberalization by RCEP and FTAAP. The results show that devel- oping countries in TPP benefit more in merchandise trade liberalization while developed countries in TPP benefit more in service trade liberalization. TPP will decrease the welfare of other APEC countries. RCEP will help East Asia countries overcome the shock of TPP while FTAAP will benefit most of the APEC countries.
出处 《亚太经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期51-57,共7页 Asia-Pacific Economic Review
基金 中国-东盟区域发展协同创新中心科研专项和教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划联合资助(编号:CWZ201506) 天津社会科学研究规划资助项目“垂直专业化与天津对外贸易的快速发展”(编号:TJYY11-2-080) 南开大学亚洲研究中心项目“亚太自由贸易区研究” (编号AS1412)
关键词 TPP 亚太自由贸易区 商品贸易 服务贸易 TPP, FTAAP, Merchandise Trade, Service Trade
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1马骏肖明智.TPP影响之量化分析[N],上海证券报,[2015 -10 - 09].
  • 2彭支伟,张伯伟.TPP和亚太自由贸易区的经济效应及中国的对策[J].国际贸易问题,2013(4):83-95. 被引量:117
  • 3Ken Itakura and Hiro Lee, Welfare Changes and Sec-toral Adjustments of Asia - Pacific Countries under AlternativeSequencings of Free Trade Agreements, manuscript,2012.
  • 4Francois,J.,Hoekman, B.,and Woerz,J. . DoesGravity Apply to Intangibles? Measuring Barriers to Trade inServices [R] . Paper presented at the CEPII - OECD Work-shop ‘Recent Developments in International Trade in Services,,Paris,2007. November.
  • 5Fontagne,L.,Guillin,A. and Mitaritonna, C.2011.Estimations of Tariff Equivalents for the Services Sectors[R] . CEPII working paper No. 2011 - 24.
  • 6Hoekman, B.,1995. Tentative First Steps: An As-sessment of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Services [R].World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1455.
  • 7KAWASAKI Kenichi, The Relative Significance ofEPAs in Asia-Pacific,RIETI Discussion Paper Series 14 -E-009, 2014.
  • 8Petri, P. A. , Plummer,M. G. and Zhai,F. . 2011.The TransPacific Partnership and Asia - Pacific Integration:A Quantitative Assessment [R] . East - West Centre WorkingPapers,No 119.

二级参考文献11

  • 1盛斌.亚太自由贸易区的政治经济分析:中国视角[J].世界经济与政治,2007(3):62-71. 被引量:28
  • 2Armington, P. S., (1969) "A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production," International Monetary Fund Staff Paper Vol. 16 No. 1.
  • 3Barfield Claude, (2011) "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Model forTwenty-First-Century Trade Agree- ments," American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research International Economic Outlook, No. 2, June.
  • 4KenichiKawasaki, (2010) "The Macro and Sectoral Significance of an FTAAP," ESRIDiscussion Paper Se-qes No.244, August.
  • 5C. Fred Bergsten, (2005) "A New Strategy for APEC," Speech at the 16th GeneralMeeting of the Pacific Economic Cooperation Council (PECC) , Seoul, South Korea, September 6.
  • 6TodsadeeAreerat, Hiroshi Kameyama, Shoichi lto and Koh-en Yamauchi, (2012) "Trans Pacific Stategic Economic Partnership With Japan, South Korea and China Integrate: General Equilibrium Approach," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration 4 (1) : 40-46.
  • 7Zhang Zhenjiang, (2009) "China' s Globalization and Its Policy," Journal oflO'tsumeikan Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities No.92.
  • 8刘晨阳.“跨太平洋战略经济伙伴协定”与美国的亚太区域合作新战略[J].国际贸易,2010(6):56-59. 被引量:36
  • 9陆建人.美国加入TPP的动因分析[J].国际贸易问题,2011(1):43-52. 被引量:101
  • 10万璐.美国TPP战略的经济效应研究——基于GTAP模拟的分析[J].当代亚太,2011(4):59-73. 被引量:103

共引文献116

同被引文献97

引证文献8

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部