期刊文献+

后大众化阶段高等教育质量保障的特点及发展趋势 被引量:25

The New Characteristics of Higher Education Quality Assurance in the Post-massification Stage and Their Developmental Tendency
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于世界高等教育质量保障的发展经验,后大众化阶段高等教育质量保障的实施主体、目标、手段以及评价标准将呈现出不同于大众化阶段高等教育质量保障的特点。在后大众化阶段,政府在高等教育质量保障中的角色、社会各界对质量保障的关注点、质量保障文化的理念以及质量保障的范畴等呈现新的发展态势。因此,对已逐步进入后大众化阶段的中国高等教育质量保障体制建设来说,应积极树立以学习者为中心的质量保障理念;营造以质量文化为灵魂、以保障制度为载体的质量保障氛围;设计具有全球视野、国际普遍认同的质量保障框架。 Based on the experience of higher education quality assurance in the world, the implementation subject, targets, methods and evaluation standards of higher education quality assurance in the post-massification stage would show different characteristics from the massification stage. Meanwhile, the role of the government, the concerns of all sectors of society, the concept of quality culture and quality assurance category would also present the new development tendency in the post -massification stage. Therefore,it should take active measures to establish the quality assurance concept with learners--orientation; to build the quality assurance system with quality assurance culture as its soul, and with regulations its carrier; to design the international universal identity quality assurance framework with a global perspective.
作者 于杨
出处 《高等教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期39-45,共7页 Journal of Higher Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC880147)
关键词 后大众化阶段 高等教育质量 质量保障 post-massification stage quality in higher education quality assurance
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1HARMAN G. Quality Assurance for Higher Education: Developing and Managing Quality Assurance in Higher Education Systems and Institutions in Asia and the Pacific[M]. Bangkok : UNESCO, 1996 : 6.
  • 2LIM D. Quality Assurance in Higher Education: A Study of Developing Countries[M]. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2001 : 13.
  • 3陈玥,马健生.发达国家高等教育质量保障的经验及启示[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2014(1):58-63. 被引量:8
  • 4ELKEN M. QU Trends 1995-2006 Literature overview[M]. Oslo: University of Oslo, 2009 : 44.
  • 5HAMBLIN D. A Model for Managing Data Assurance in Higher Education[J]. Phoenix Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,2012, (8): 421-435.
  • 6EWELL T. Institutional Characteristics and Faculty, Administrator Perceptions of Outcomes: An Exploratory Analysis [J]. Research in Higher Education, 1989, (2) : 13-36.
  • 7樊增广,史万兵.制衡与博弈:国际高等教育质量保障模式分析[J].外国教育研究,2015,42(8):118-128. 被引量:6
  • 8王战军,乔伟峰.中国高等教育质量保障的新理念和新制度[J].清华大学教育研究,2014,35(3):29-34. 被引量:24
  • 9WITTEK L. On the Problems of Asking for a Definition of Quality in Education Scandinavian[J]. Journal of Educational Research, 2011, (12) : 671-684.
  • 10HARVEY L, GREEN D. Defining Quality Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education[J]. 1993, (1) :9-34.

二级参考文献177

  • 1蔡瑜琢.高等教育政策分析方法研究[J].高等工程教育研究,2004,52(4):47-51. 被引量:9
  • 2张民选.关于高等教育认证机制的研究[J].教育研究,2005,26(2):37-44. 被引量:49
  • 3胡赤弟.高等教育中的利益相关者分析[J].教育研究,2005,26(3):38-46. 被引量:279
  • 4田恩舜.从控制到合作:荷兰高等教育质量保证模式的改革[J].中国高等教育评估,2005,18(4):37-40. 被引量:8
  • 5约翰·布瑞兰.欧洲高等教育评估[A].谷贤林等译.国家、高等教育与市场[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2005.214-228.
  • 6Luc Weber, Sjur Bergen. The Public Responsibility for higher education and research [M].Council of Europe, 2005:151-156.
  • 7Walsh K. Quality and Public Services [J]. Public Administration, 69 (4): 503-514.
  • 8Dianae Green. What is Quality in Higher Education? [M]. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, 1994:16.
  • 9Hanna Alaniska. Student Involvement in the Process of Quality Assurance Agencies [EB/OL]. [2010-10-30]. Helsinki: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 2006:32-41. http://www.enqa.eu/pubs.lasso.
  • 10Sjur Bergan. Student's Participation in Higher Education Governance [EB/OL]. [2010-10-30]. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/highereducation/ Governance/SB_student_partieipation_EN.pdf.

共引文献305

同被引文献236

引证文献25

二级引证文献112

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部