期刊文献+

降雨侵蚀过程中黑土团聚体流失特征 被引量:33

An experimental study of Mollisol aggregate loss characteristics during rainfall erosion processes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 坡面侵蚀过程中土壤团聚体流失可直接反映土壤团聚体的破碎程度以及雨滴打击和径流搬运之间的相互作用。基于模拟降雨试验,研究降雨侵蚀过程中黑土坡面土壤团聚体流失特征。试验处理包括黑土区常见的2个侵蚀性降雨(50、100mm/h降雨强度)和2个坡度(5°和7.5°)以及2种地面处理(裸露休闲和秸秆覆盖)。结果表明:裸露休闲处理下径流含沙量是秸秆覆盖处理的27.5—141.3倍,且不同处理下含沙量最大值均出现在降雨初期。覆盖秸秆与无覆盖试验处理下土壤团聚体流失均以<0.25 mm微团聚体为主。秸秆覆盖试验处理下泥沙中<0.25 mm微团聚体流失量占团聚体流失总量的34.5%—56.8%,而在裸露休闲处理下其值达到82%以上。秸秆覆盖处理下的各粒级团聚体流失量较裸露休闲试验处理减少了33.3%以上,其中差异最明显的是≥1 mm粒级团聚体与<0.25 mm微团聚体,二者分别较裸露休闲处理减少了43.1%—96.4%和99.0%以上。秸秆覆盖处理下的0.25—2 mm粒级团聚体流失比例较裸露休闲处理明显增加。秸秆覆盖试验处理下流失团聚体的平均重量直径(MWD)和几何平均直径(GMD)分别是裸露休闲处理的1.5—2.9和1.7—2.0倍;而秸秆覆盖处理下的平均重量比表面积(MWSSA)和分形维数(D)较裸露休闲处理分别减少了26.2%—32.9%和5.1%—6.7%。 Soil aggregate loss during hillslope erosion processes directly reflects the interaction among the degree of soil aggregate breakdown, raindrop impact and runoff transportation. Different soil aggregate breakdown mechanisms result in the size distribution of soil aggregate is different. Furthermore, soil aggregate loss has an important influence on hillslope soil loss. However, existing studies have mostly focused on aggregate stability. Rainfall simulation experiments were conducted to investigate Mollisol aggregate loss during rainfall erosion processes. The experimental treatments included two rainfall intensities (50 mm/h and 100 mm/h) , representative of erosive rainfalls in the black soil region of northeast China; two common slope gradients (5° and 7.5°) ; and two surface conditions (bare land and straw mulch cover). Each experimental treatment had two replications. The tested soil was the Mollisol, which was collected from the upper 20 cm of the plow layer in a maize field in Yushu City, Jilin Province, which is typical of the black soil of the region of northeast China. This study was conducted in the rainfall simulation laboratory of the State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Yangling City, China. A rainfall simulator system with a side-sprinkler was used to apply rainfall. The soil pan was 8 m long, 1.5 m wide and 0.6 m deep. During the rainfall simulations, runoff samples were collected in 15-L buckets. Half of each runoff sample was immediately processed through a set of sieves with apertures of 5 mm, 2 mm, 1 mm, 0.5 ram, and 0.25 ram. After sieving, the lost aggregate samples and the remaining half of each runoff samples were oven-dried to calculate the soil and aggregate losses. The results showed that sediment concentration in the bare land treatments was 27.5--141.3 times greater than that in the straw mulch cover treatments. The maximum values for sediment concentration were observed at the beginning of the rainfall simulation, in all treatments. This indicated that the dominant Mollisol aggregate breakdown mechanisms were slaking and mechanical breakdown, and that the effect of slaking was mainly exerted in the initial stages of rainfall. The 〈0.25 mm micro-aggregates were the main aggregate size fraction lost in both the bare land and the straw mulch cover treatments. The 〈0.25 mm micro-aggregate loss comprised 34.5--56.8% of the total aggregate loss in the straw mulch cover treatments, whereas the loss was 〉82% in the bare land treatments. Compared with the bare land treatments, the loss of every size aggregate decreased 〉33.3% in the straw mulch cover treatments; thus, the most significant differences in soil aggregate loss were observed in the ≥ 1 mm and 〈0.25 mm size fractions between the bare land and the straw mulch cover treatments. Compared with the bare land treatments, the loss of the ≥ 1 mm size fraction and the 〈0.25 mm micro-aggregates decreased 43.1%--96.4% and 99.0%, respectively, in the straw mulch cover treatments. The proportion of 0.25--2 mm aggregates in the sediment from the straw mulch cover treatments increased and was greater than that of the bare land treatments. These results indicated that raindrop impact was the main driving force for aggregate breakdown. The straw mulch cover eliminated the effect of raindrop impact on soil aggregate breakdown, and also decreased runoff transport capacity. The mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) of aggregates in the sediments for the straw mulch cover treatments were 1.5--2.9 and 1.7--2.0 times greater than those for the bare land treatments. Compared with the bare land treatments, the mean weight soil specific (MWSSA) and fraction dimension (D) decreased 26. 2%--32. 9% and 5. 1%--6. 7%, respectively. The above four indicators reflect the aggregate loss characteristics of Mollisols.
出处 《生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期2264-2273,共10页 Acta Ecologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(41271299)
关键词 模拟降雨 降雨侵蚀过程 团聚体流失 黑土区 rainfall simulation rainfall soil erosion process aggregates loss black soil region
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Le Bissonnais Y. Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility : I. Theory and methodology. European Journal of SoilScience, 1996,47(4) : 425-437.
  • 2Zheng F L, Merrill S D, Huang C H, Tanaka D L, Darboux F, Liebig M A, Halvorson A D. Runoff, soil erosion, and erodibility of conservationreserve program land under crop and hay production. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2004, 68(4) : 133-139.
  • 3Roth C H, Eggert T. Mechanisms of aggregate breakdown involved in surface sealing, runoff generation and sediment concentration on loess soils. Soil and Tillage Research, 1994, 32 (2/3) : 253-268.
  • 4Ramos M C, Nacci S, Pla I. Effect of raindrop impact and its relationship with aggregate stability to different disaggregation forces. Catena, 2003 ,53(4) : 365-376.
  • 5史志华,闫峰陵,李朝霞,王天巍,蔡崇法.红壤表土团聚体破碎方式对坡面产流过程的影响[J].自然科学进展,2007,17(2):217-224. 被引量:19
  • 6Legout C,Leguedois S, Le Bissonnais Y, Malam I 0. Splash distance and size distributions for various soils. Geoderma, 2005, 124(3/4):279-292.
  • 7Young R A, Wiersma J L. The role of rainfall impact in soil detachment and transport. Water Resources Research, 1973,9(6) : 1629-1636.
  • 8Kinnell P I A. The mechanics of raindrop induced flow transport. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 1990, 28(4) ; 497-516.
  • 9陈晓燕,牛青霞,周继,魏朝富,谢德体,何丙辉.人工模拟降雨条件下紫色土陡坡地土壤颗粒分布空间变异特征[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(5):163-168. 被引量:30
  • 10周一杨,王恩姮,陈祥伟.模拟降雨条件下黑土溅蚀与团聚体分选特征[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(6):176-179. 被引量:24

二级参考文献252

共引文献1766

同被引文献557

引证文献33

二级引证文献327

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部