期刊文献+

超稠油FAST-SAGD技术影响因素分析 被引量:6

FAST-SAGD Application and Its Influencing Factors in Super Heavy Oil Reservoirs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用稠油热采数值模拟手段,以辽河油田超稠油油藏为基础,对比FAST-SAGD与传统双水平井SAGD的开发效果,并分析影响FAST-SAGD的关键因素,以提高SAGD的开发效果。研究结果表明:FAST-SAGD蒸汽腔横向发育速度比传统SAGD明显加快,采收率提高2.5%,累计油汽比增加0.039 m3/m3,生产时间缩短46.6%。以采收率与热效率作为评价指标,得到FAST-SAGD影响因素的最优值:添加井与SAGD井组的生产井之间垂向距离为6m,启动时间为12个月,吞吐周期数为2,注汽压力为10 MPa,注汽速度为800 m3/d,SAGD井组注气井注汽速度为200 m3/d。研究成果对FAST-SAGD的矿场应用具有一定的理论指导意义。 Heavy oil thermal recovery numerical simulation is used to compare the performances of FAST-SAGD and conventional dual-horizontal-well SAGD in the super heavy oil reservoirs of Liaohe Oilfield. The key factors related to FAST-SAGD performance are analyzed to improve SAGD performance. Result illustrates that the steam chamber of FAST-SAGD expands significantly faster than that of conventional SAGD,the recovery factor is increased by 2. 5%,the cumulative oil-steam ratio is increased by 0. 039 m3/ m3 and the production period is reduced by 46. 6%. Recovery factor and thermal efficiency are used to gain the optimum parameters of FAST-SAGD: the vertical distance between the adding well and production well of SAGD wellgroup is 6 m,the start-up period is 12 months,the huff-puff cycle number is 2,the steam injecting pressure is 10 MPa,the steam injecting rate is 800 m3/ d and the steam injecting rate of injection well in SAGD wellgroup is 200 m3/ d. This research could provide some theoretical guidance for field application of FAST-SAGD technology.
出处 《特种油气藏》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期89-92,155,共4页 Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs
基金 国家科技重大专项“新一代油藏数值模拟软件”(2011ZX05009-006) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“非常规油气储层特征及开采机理研究”(2652015142)
关键词 FAST-SAGD 添加井 敏感因素 采收率 累计油汽比 辽河油田 FAST-SAGD adding well sensitive factor recovery factor cumulative oil-steam ratio
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1BUTLER R M. Steam-Assisted gravity drainage:concept, development, performance and future [ J ]. Journal of Cana- dian Petroleum Technology, 1992,31 (8) : 44- 50.
  • 2TAMER M, GATES I D. Impact of well configuration on performance of Steam- Based gravity drainage processes [ C] .CIPC2009-046,2009: 1-15.
  • 3POLIKAR M, CYR T J, COATS R M. Fast-SAGD: half the wells and 30% less steam [ C ]. SPE65509, 2000 : 1 - 6.
  • 4CYR T J, COATES R M, POLIKAR M. Steam-Assisted gravity drainage heavy oil recovery process: United States, 625733413[ P]. 2001.
  • 5GONG J,POLIK Ar M,CHALATURNYK R J. Fast SAGD and geomeehanical mechanisms [ C ] . CIPC2002 - 163, 2002: 1-10.
  • 6SHIN H, POLIK Ar M. Review of reservoir parameters to optimize SAGD and Fast-SAGD operating conditions [ J ]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2007,41 ( 1 ) : 35-41.
  • 7SHIN H,POLIKAR M. Fast-SAGD application in the Al- berta Oil Sands Areas [ J ]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2006,45 (9) :46-53.
  • 8DANG T Q,CHEN Z J,et al. Fast-SAGD vs SAGD: a comparative numerical simulation in three major formation of Albert' s Oil Sands [ C ]. SPE 144149, 2012 : 1 - 17.
  • 9HUY X Nguyen, WISUP Bae, XUAN V Tran, et al. Experimental design to optimize operating Conditions for SAGD Process, Peace River Oil Sands, Alberta [ C ]. SPE145917,2011 : 1-10.
  • 10SHIN H, POLIKAR M. Experimental investigation of the Fast-SAGD Process [ C ]. CIPC2006-097,2006 : 1 - 11.

二级参考文献10

共引文献16

同被引文献87

引证文献6

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部