期刊文献+

嘲弄话语回应的相关与接受

Relation and reception in teasing response
原文传递
导出
摘要 嘲弄是一种常见的会话幽默现象,但其在自然语境中的理解和回应尚未引发充分的语用关注,嘲弄回应者的能动主体性和对会话的策略建构也没有得到深层的阐释。本文以电视访谈会话为自然语料,在行为相关和人际接受层面对嘲弄回应进行新的类型总结和互动分析,指出嘲弄回应的方式和内容反映了回应者对会话接受的交际考虑和对信息相关的策略选择,其本质是回应者以接受为动因、以相关度为策略的主体目的行为。 Teasing as a type of conversational humor is common in daily life, but little attention has been paid to teasing response in natural communication. Taking a Chinese multi- participant talk show as data, this study attempts to address the issue of teasing response in Chinese conversations. An interactive discourse- analytic approach was adopted, yielding the following findings:(1) teasing responses in conversations are strategies with different relation degrees and can be categorized into maximally-relevant, very-relevant, weakly-relevant and minimally- relevant responses; and(2) teasing respondents base their choices of relation degree on the consideration of personal reception. The paper argues that teasing response in essence is respondents strategic employment of relation degree with reception consideration.
作者 张颖
机构地区 上海大学
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期178-187,291,共10页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"幽默作为语用能力:会话幽默的接受互动研究"(13YJC740141) 上海市教委科研创新项目"会话幽默的协同模式与协同取效机制研究"(14YS013)的阶段性成果
关键词 嘲弄回应 相关 接受 主体性 teasing response relation reception subjectivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Brown, P. & S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 2Drew, P. 1987. Po-faced receipts of teases [J]. Linguistics 25: 219-253.
  • 3Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and Conversation [A]. In A. P. Martinich (ed.). Philosophy of Language[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 165-175.
  • 4Gumperz, J. 2001. Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective [A]. In D. Schiffrin., D.Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis [C]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 215-228.
  • 5Hay, J. 2001. The pragmatics of humor support [J]. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research (1): 55-82.
  • 6Ilie, C. 2001. Semi-institutional discourse: The case of talk shows [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 209-254.
  • 7Keltner, D., L. Capps, A. M. Kring, R. C. Young & E. A. Heerey. 2001. Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review [J]. Psychological Bulletin (2): 229-248.
  • 8Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Lytra, V. 2007. Teasing in contact encounters: Frames, participant positions and responses [J].Multilingua 26: 381-408.
  • 10Schnurr, S. & A. Chan. 2011. When laughter is not enough: Responding to teasing and selfdenigrating humour at work [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 20-35.

二级参考文献70

共引文献914

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部