期刊文献+

飞机驾驶舱显示界面脑力负荷判别预测生理模型 被引量:15

Integrated physiological model for mental workload assessment and prediction of aircraft flight deck display interface
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对飞机驾驶舱显示界面脑力负荷的客观判别预测问题,综合采用事件相关电位(ERP)、心电图(ECG)和眼电图(EOG)3类生理测量技术,结合主观测评法和绩效测评法,在同一飞行实验任务中开展脑力负荷的实验测量与数学建模研究。实验结果表明:随着脑力负荷的增加,ERP测量技术中的失匹配负波(MMN)成分的峰值幅度(在Fz电极处)显著增加,P3a成分的峰值(在Fz电极处)显著降低;ECG测量技术中的心率变异性指标全部窦性心搏RR间期(简称RR间期)的标准差(SDNN)的数值显著降低;EOG测量技术中的眨眼次数显著降低。在此基础上,基于Bayes判别方法构建了脑力负荷判别预测生理综合评估模型,并将生理综合评估模型判别结果与NASA任务负荷指数(NASA_TLX)量表判别结果进行了比较,生理综合评估模型判别结果略高于NASA_TLX判别结果。该模型为飞机驾驶舱显示界面脑力负荷状态的客观、实时判定和预测提供了一种新的方法,同时也为中国正在研发的新型战斗机和大型客机驾驶舱显示界面中的人为因素适航审定工作提供了新的符合性验证工具。 This paper focuses on the objective discrimination and prediction of mental workload of the aircraft flight deck display interface. By three physiological measurement methods of event-related potentials( ERP),electrocardiograph( ECG) and electro-oculogram( EOG),as well as subjective evaluation and performance evaluation,both experimental measurement and mathematical modeling of mental workload were carried out under the same flight simulation task conditions. The experimental results indicate that as the mental workload increased,the peak amplitude of the mismatch negativity( MMN) at Fz significantly increased,while the peak amplitude of P3 a at Fz,the standard deviation of normal-to-normal RR intervals( SDNN)value,and the eye blink numbers significantly decreased. Based on the results of experimental measurement,the Bayesian discrimination analysis method was employed to construct the mental workload discrimination model of the aircraft flight deck display interface. The integrated physiological model showed a higher accuracy in the discrimination and prediction of mental workload compared with NASA_TLX. Thus,this model provides not only a new approach for the objective and real-time discrimination and prediction of mental workload of the aircraft cockpit display interface,but also a new compliance verification tool for the human factor airworthiness certification of flight deck display interface of the new generation fighter aircraft and large passenger aircraft.
出处 《北京航空航天大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期685-693,共9页 Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
基金 国家"973"计划(2010CB734104) 民航安全能力建设资金(MHRD20141010)~~
关键词 驾驶舱 显示界面 脑力负荷 生理测量 预测模型 适航审定 flight deck display interface mental workload physiological measurement prediction model airworthiness certification
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1宋国萍,张侃.驾驶疲劳后听觉信息自动加工的ERP研究[J].人类工效学,2011,17(4):1-4. 被引量:5
  • 2柳忠起,袁修干,刘伟,康卫勇.飞行员注意力分配的定量测量方法[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2006,32(5):518-520. 被引量:35
  • 3李文选.脑力劳动负荷的评价[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,1997,15(1):55-57. 被引量:3
  • 4MIL-STD-1787B(USAF). Aircraft Display Symbology[S].The Department of Defense of United States of America,1996.
  • 5Terese A D. An investigation on subjective assessment of workload and postural stability under conditions of joint mental and physical demands[D].America: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2003
  • 6Stark J M. Pilot performance and eye movement activity with varying levels of display integration in a synthetic vision cockpit [ D]. America: Old Dominion University,2004
  • 7Terence Y Kudo. Using statistical process control methods to classify pilot mental workload[ D]. America: Department of the Air Force, Air University, 2001
  • 8Caldwell J L, Gilreath S R, Norman D N. A survey of work and sleep hours of US army aviation personnel [ R ]. USAAR L-99-16,1999.
  • 9Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity [ J]. Psychophysiology,2001,38 (3) :5572 - 5778.
  • 10Naatanen R, Jacobsen T, Winkler I. Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN) : a review of the evi-dence [ J ]. Psychophysiology, 2005,42 ( 1 ) : 25 - 32.

共引文献41

同被引文献118

引证文献15

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部