期刊文献+

茶树两个Dof转录因子的分离及其在温度胁迫中的响应分析 被引量:12

Isolation and Expression Analysis of Two Temperature Responsive Dof Genes from Camellia sinensis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 茶树是一种重要的经济作物,温度胁迫对茶叶生产影响较大.本研究以茶树品种迎霜为实验材料,克隆获得2个编码Dof转录因子的基因CsDof1和CsDof2.序列分析显示,CsDof1含有1 389 bp,编码463个氨基酸;CsDof2含有1 458 bp,编码486个氨基酸.CsDof1和CsDof2转录因子都具有典型的锌指结构域,分别位于第133-195和124-186个氨基酸位点之间.对CsDof1和CsDof2转录因子理化性质、亲/疏水性、二级和三级结构分析显示,两者都是亲水性蛋白且显偏碱性.空间结构分析显示,CsDof1和CsDof2均有1个α-螺旋,且Dof结构域的位点完全相同,均有4个半胱氨酸残基.实时定量PCR表明,CsDof1和CsDof2在不同茶树品种、不同温度胁迫下均能诱导表达,且表达呈现差异. Tea is an important economic crop. Tea production is affected by temperature factors. CsDof1 and CsDof2, which encode Dof transcription factors, were cloned from tea cultivar ‘Yingshuang’ [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze]. The nucleotide and amino acid sequences, phylogenetic tree and molecular models of the CsDof1 and CsDof2 were analyzed. The results showed that the CsDof1 and CsDof2 are 1389 and 1458 nucleotides in length, which encode 463 and 486 amino acids respectively. Typical zinc finger domains are present in both CsDof1 and CsDof2, from coden 133 to 195 and 124 to 186 respectively. The CsDof1 and CsDof2 were hydrophilic proteins. The three-dimensional structures of CsDof1 and CsDof2 indicated the presence of a highly conserved Dof domain with four cysteine residues. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis showed that CsDof1 and CsDof2 were induced by different temperature stresses and the expression profiles were different among tea cultivars.
出处 《茶叶科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期312-322,共11页 Journal of Tea Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(31200520 31570691)
关键词 茶树 Dof转录因子 锌指结构 温度胁迫 基因表达 Camellia sinensis Dof transcription factor zinc finger temperature stress gene expression
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1刘欣,李云.转录因子与植物抗逆性研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(4):61-65. 被引量:38
  • 2Umemura Y, Ishiduka T, Yamamoto R, et al. The Dof domain, a zinc finger DNA-binding domain conserved only in higher plants, truly functions as a Cys2/Cys2 Zn finger domain [J]. The Plant Journal, 2004, 37(5): 741-749.
  • 3Yanagisawa S, Izui K. Molecular cloning of two DNA-binding proteins of maize that are structurally different but interact with the same sequence motif [J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1993, 268(21): 16028-16036.
  • 4Yanagisawa S. The Dof family of plant transcription factors [J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2002, 7(12): 555-560.
  • 5Lijavetzky D, Carbonero P, Vicente-Carbajosa J. Genome-wide comparative phylogenetic analysis of the rice and Arabidopsis Dof gene families [J]. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2003, 3(1): 17.
  • 6Moreno-Risueno M á, Martínez M, Vicente-Carbajosa J, et al. The family of DOF transcription factors: from green unicellular algae to vascular plants [J]. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2007, 277(4): 379-390.
  • 7Diaz I, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Abraham Z, et al. The GAMYB protein from barley interacts with the DOF transcription factor BPBF and activates endosperm-specific genes during seed development [J]. The Plant Journal, 2002, 29(4): 453-464.
  • 8Mena M, Cejudo F J, Isabel-Lamoneda I, et al. A role for the DOF transcription factor BPBF in the regulation of gibberellin-responsive genes in barley aleurone [J]. Plant Physiology, 2002, 130(1): 111-119.
  • 9Nakano T, Suzuki K, Ohtsuki N, et al. Identification of genes of the plant-specific transcription-factor families cooperatively regulated by ethylene and jasmonate in Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. Journal of Plant Research, 2006, 119(4): 407-413.
  • 10Yanagisawa S. Dof domain proteins: plant-specific transcription factors associated with diverse phenomena unique to plants [J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2004, 45(4): 386-391.

二级参考文献41

  • 1Singh K,Foley R C,Onate-Sanchez L.Transcription factors in plant defense and stress response[J].Curr Opin Plant Biol,2002,5 (5):430~436.
  • 2Saiflz M B,Goff S A,Chandler V L.Extensive mutagenesis of a transcript-ional activation domain identtfies singlehy drophobic and acidic amino acids important for activation in vivo[J].Mol Cell Biol,1997,17:115~122.
  • 3Wu K,Tian L,Hollingworth J,et al.Functional analysis of tomato Pti4 in Arabidopsis[J].Plant Physiol,2002,128:30~37.
  • 4Park J M,Park C J,Lee S B,et al.Overexpression of the tobacco Tsil gene encoding an EREBP/AP2-type transcription factor enhances resistance against pathogen attack and osmotic stress in tobacco[J].Plant Cell,2001,13:1035~1046.
  • 5Aida M,Ishida T,Fkaki H,et al.Genes involved in organ seperation in Arabidopsis,analysis of the cup-shaped cotyledon mutant[J].Plant Cell,1997,9:841~857.
  • 6Olsen A N,Ernst H A,Leggio L L,et al.NAC transcription factors:structurally distinct,funcronally diverse[J].Trends in Plant Sci,2005,10(2):79~87.
  • 7Tran L,Nakashima K,Sakuma Y,et al.Isolation and functional analysis of Arabidopsis stress-inducible NAC transcription factors that bind to a drought responsive Cis-element in the EARLY RESPONSIVE TO DEHYDRATION STRESS promoter[J].Plant Cell,2004,16:2481 ~2498
  • 8Selth L A,Dogra S C,Rasheed M S,et al.A NAC domain protein interacts with tomato leaf curl virus replication accessory protein and enhances viral replication[J].Plant Cell,2005,17:311~325.
  • 9Gu YQ,Yang C,Thara V K,et al.Pti4 is induced by ethylene and salicylic acid,and its product is phosphorylated by the Pto kinase[J].Plant Cell,2000,12:771 ~786.
  • 10Wu K,Tian L,Hollingworth J,et al.Functional analysis of tomato Pit4 in Arabidopsis[J].Plant Physiol,2002,128:30~37.

共引文献37

同被引文献72

引证文献12

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部