期刊文献+

微创经皮肾镜治疗孤立肾与非孤立肾结石的比较 被引量:12

Comparison of the stones with solitary kidney and without solitary kidney treated by minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较微创经皮肾镜碎石取石术(MPCNL)治疗孤立肾与非孤立肾肾结石的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性收集广州医科大学第一附属医院2011年9月至2014年6月采用MPCNL治疗孤立肾与非孤立肾结石患者一期手术的资料。孤立肾组128例,非孤立肾单侧肾结石组530例。依据年龄、体质量指数、合并症、手术史、结石大小、结石位置、肾积水成功匹配94对,比较两组的手术时间、血红蛋白下降值、结石清除率、并发症。结果孤立肾组及非孤立肾组在年龄、体质量指数、合并症、手术史、结石大小、结石位置、肾积水方面差异无统计学意义。平均手术时间为(60.7±33.8)min和(56.3±31.2)min,差异无统计学意义(P=0.381)。术后48 h平均血红蛋白下降值为(12.7±11.3)g/L和(11.8±9.9)g/L,差异无统计学意义(P=0.588)。一期术后48 h结石清除率为55.3%(52例)和62.8%(59例),差异无统计学意义(P=0.299)。术后并发症发生率分别为20.2%(19例)和17%(16例),差异无统计学意义(P=0.55)。结论 MPCNL治疗孤立肾结石与非孤立肾结石一期手术的安全性和有效性相似。 Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy(MPCNL) in the treatment of renal calculi with solitary kidney and without solitary kidney.Methods The data of patients with solitary kidney and without solitary kidney who underwent MPCNL between Septemter 2011 and June 2014 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were collected. 128 cases of patients with solitary kidney and 530 cases of patients with non solitary kidney were collected. 94 pairs of patients were matched by applying the following criteria: age, body mass index,complications, surgical history, stone size, stone location and hydronephrosis. The operative time,postoperative hemoglobin decreased value, postoperative 48 h stone free rate and complications were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, body mass index, complications, surgical history, stone size, stone location and hydronephrosis. The mean operation time was(60.7 ±33.8) min vs(56.3 ±31.2) min, the difference was not statistically significant( P=0. 381). The mean hemoglobin drop value was(12.7±11.3) g/l vs(11.8±9.9) g/l, the difference was not statistically significant(P=0.588). The stone clearance rate was 55.3%(52 cases) vs62.8%(59 cases), the difference was not statistically significant(P=0.299). The postoperative complications was 20.2% vs 17.0%, the difference was not statistically significant(P=0.55). Conclusion MPCNL is safe and effective for renal stones in the patients with or without soltitary kidney.
出处 《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》 2016年第2期30-33,共4页 Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition)
基金 广东省科技厅项目(2013B021800190)
关键词 肾造口术 经皮 微创 孤立肾 肾结石 Percutaneous nephrolithotomy Minimally invasive Solitary kidney Renal calculi
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Femstr6m I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique [J]. Stand J Urol Nephrol, 1976, 10 (3): 257-259.
  • 2Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G, Krombach P, et al. Does open stone surgery still play a role in the treatment of urolithiasis? Data of a primary urolithiasis center [J]. J Endourol, 2009, 23 (7): 1209-1212.
  • 3Srivastava A, Singh KJ, Suri A, et al. Vascular complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: are there any predictive factors? [J]. Urology, 2005, 66(1): 38-40.
  • 4Resorlu B1, Kara C, Oguz U, et al. Pereutaneous nephrolithotomyfor complex caliceal and staghom stones in patients with solitary kidney[J]. Urol Res, 2011, 39(3): 171-176.
  • 5Akman T, Binbay M, Tekinarslan E, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with solitary kidneys: asingle-center experience[J]. Urology, 2011, 78(2): 272-276.
  • 6李建兴,胡卫国,杨波,陈亮,马凯,黄晓波,王晓峰.孤立肾肾结石经皮肾镜取石术安全性分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2009,30(11):738-740. 被引量:19
  • 7Jackman SV, Hedican SP, Peters CA, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool are children:experience with a new technique[J]. Urology, 1998, 52(4): 697-701.
  • 8Zeng G, Zhao Z, Wan S, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for simple and complex renal caliceal stones: a comparative analysis of more than 10,000 cases [J]. J Endourol, 2013, 27(10): 1203-1208.
  • 9Bucuras V, Gopalakrishnam G, Wolf JS, et al. The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: nephrolithotomy in 189 patients with solitary kidneys [J]. J Endourol, 2012, 26 (4): 336-341.
  • 10E1-Nahas AR, Shokeir AA, E1-Assmy AM, et al. Post-percutaneous nephrolithotonay extensive hemorrhage: a study of risk factors[J]. J Urol, 2007, 177(2): 576-579.

二级参考文献42

  • 1徐桂彬,李逊,何朝辉,何永忠,雷鸣.微创经皮肾镜取石术出血量影响因素的分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(7):456-459. 被引量:123
  • 2李逊.微创经皮肾穿刺取石术[M]//黄健,李逊.微创泌尿外科学.武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,2005:207-213.
  • 3Clarke M,Oxman AD.Cochrane Reviewers Handbook 4.2[updated April 2004].In:Review Manager (RevMan)[Computer program].Version 5.0 Oxford,England:The Cochrane Collaboration,2004.
  • 4Feng MI,Tamaddon K,Mikhail A,et al.Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.J Urol,2001,58(3):345-350.
  • 5Cheng F,Yu W,Zhang X,et al.Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones.J Endourol,2010,24(10):1579-1582.
  • 6Zhong W,Zeng C,Wu W,et al.Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with multiple mini tracts in a single session in treating staghorn calculi.Urol Res,2010 Sep 7.[Epub ahead of print].
  • 7Miller NL,Lingeman JE.Management of kidney stones.BMJ,2007,334 (7591):468-472.
  • 8Watterson JD,Soon S,Jana K.Access related complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy:Urology versus radiology at a single academic institution.J Urol,2006,176(1):142-145.
  • 9Gupta NP,Mishra S,Suryawanshi M,et al.Comparison of standard with tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.J Endourol,2008,22(7):1441-1446.
  • 10Jackman SV,Docimo SG,Cadeddu JA,et al.The "mini-perc" technique:A less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy.World J Urol,1998,16(6):371-374.

共引文献154

同被引文献105

  • 1程跃,严泽军,谢国海,袁鹤胜,刘冠琳.“粉末化碎石”在输尿管软镜治疗肾结石中的应用[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2013,2(3). 被引量:64
  • 2徐桂彬,李逊,何朝辉,何永忠,雷鸣.微创经皮肾镜取石术出血量影响因素的分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(7):456-459. 被引量:123
  • 3胡俊杰,廖国强,卞崔冬,袁涛.输尿管镜下双频激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石268例报告[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(10):946-947. 被引量:16
  • 4Femstr6m I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique [J]. Stand J Urol Nephrol, 1976, 10 (3): 257-259.
  • 5Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G, Krombach P, et al. Does open stone surgery still play a role in the treatment of urolithiasis? Data of a primary urolithiasis center [J]. J Endourol, 2009, 23 (7): 1209-1212.
  • 6Srivastava A, Singh KJ, Suri A, et al. Vascular complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: are there any predictive factors? [J]. Urology, 2005, 66(1): 38-40.
  • 7Resorlu B1, Kara C, Oguz U, et al. Pereutaneous nephrolithotomyfor complex caliceal and staghom stones in patients with solitary kidney[J]. Urol Res, 2011, 39(3): 171-176.
  • 8Akman T, Binbay M, Tekinarslan E, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with solitary kidneys: asingle-center experience[J]. Urology, 2011, 78(2): 272-276.
  • 9Jackman SV, Hedican SP, Peters CA, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool are children:experience with a new technique[J]. Urology, 1998, 52(4): 697-701.
  • 10Zeng G, Zhao Z, Wan S, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for simple and complex renal caliceal stones: a comparative analysis of more than 10,000 cases [J]. J Endourol, 2013, 27(10): 1203-1208.

引证文献12

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部