摘要
知识边界的开放与持续的理论争论一直被认为是国际关系学科的两大显著特征。面对急剧变化的现实世界,国际关系学者们愈发意识到那些曾经主导国际关系研究的理论与方法已难以全面而有效地解释现实世界的复杂性与多样性。在国际关系的理论研究领域,学者们为寻求弥合理论分歧、实现跨范式交流并推动学科发展做出了诸多积极尝试,理论合成与分析折中主义在这当中最具代表性和实用价值,然而在相关研究和探讨中却存在将两者混淆的现象。从科学哲学的视角出发对国际关系理论合成与分析折中主义进行比较辨析,将有助于研究者们更好地理解两者的差异。
The openness of knowledge boundary and the persistency of theoretical debates have always been considered as two significant features in the discipline of international relations.In face of the real world in drastic and rapid changes,scholars of IR increasingly realize that theories and methods which have dominated the international studies can no longer explain the complexity and diversity of the real world comprehensively and effectively.In order to bridge the gap,realize the cross-paradigm communication and move the discipline forward,IR scholars have made many positive attempts in the field of theoretical researches,among which the theoretical synthesis and analytic eclecticism are the most representative with pratical value.However,there are some confusions between them in the related researches and discussions.The authors will make a comparative analysis based on the perspective of philosophy of science in order to distinguish between them more clearly.
出处
《国际论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第3期42-47,80,共6页
International Forum
