摘要
伴随着经济发展,因离婚引起的债务纠纷已由夫妻间向夫妻与第三人间转变,这增加了司法实务中认定与厘清夫妻共同债务的难度。最高人民法院司法解释在夫妻债务的承担方式上,主张侧重保护第三人利益,但没有明确夫妻对内举证责任分配问题,存在疏漏。建议在《婚姻法》中确立家事代理制度,构建夫妻共同债务认定的"两阶段"理论,以明晰和区分夫妻共同债务与个人债务,适当加重债权人注意义务,合理分配债权人与夫妻之间的举证责任。
Along with economic development, debt disputes caused by the divorce have moved from between couples to between the couple and the third party, which increases the difficulty to identify and clarify jointly debt in judicial practice. The Supreme People＇s Court advocates more protection to the third party＇s interests in judicial interpretation, but leaves open to clarify distribution of evidential burden between the couple. The paper recommends to establish family agency system in ＂Marriage Law＂, build a ＂two-stage＂ joint debt identification theory to clarify and distinguish joint debt and personal debt between husband and wife, increase appropriately creditor＇s duty of care and allocates equitably the burden of proof between the creditor and the couple.
出处
《萍乡学院学报》
2016年第2期40-45,共6页
Journal of Pingxiang University
