期刊文献+

信仰传统文化的企业家对企业社会责任行为影响过程研究——以TW公司为例 被引量:5

How Entrepreneurs with Traditional Values Influence Corporate Social Responsibility Behavior:Case Study on TW Company
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在对TW公司的观察中发现研究问题,即具有传统文化信仰的企业家如何影响企业社会责任行为的过程,并对TW公司进行了探索性案例研究。本文采用扎根理论研究方法,经过开放式编码、主轴编码和选择式编码后提炼出主范畴,以及连接这些范畴的"故事线",在此基础上提出了一系列命题和理论模型。本文的主要研究发现是:信仰传统文化的企业家价值观与其他企业成员价值观产生一定冲突时,主要依赖横暴权力和长老权力的行使影响企业社会责任行为。本文最后对着眼于传统文化的中国管理研究进行了展望。 This paper addresses the question of how entrepreneurs with traditional values and beliefs can influence corporate social responsibility behavior through observing a special company initialed TW.Based on the grounded theory,An exploratory case study was conducted on TW Company through open decoding,spindle decoding and selective decoding,refining some main categories and finally linking these categories with a"story line".Several propositions were developed and integrated into a theoretical model.The main finding of this study is that the entrepreneur with traditional values and beliefs influenced the company's CSR behavior primarily by using coercive power and"the power of Elder"when there were conflicts between his and other members' values.At the end of the article,our wish is showed to see more Chinese management studies regarding traditional values.
出处 《管理案例研究与评论》 CSSCI 2016年第1期1-13,共13页 Journal of Management Case Studies
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"道义场域:中华传统文化嵌入型企业的制度形塑 生态群落演化及作用机制"(71572060)
关键词 价值观 横暴权力 长老权力 企业社会责任(CSR) 传统文化信仰 values coercive power the power of Elder corporate social responsibility(CSR) traditional culture and beliefs
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1Longenecker J G, MeKinney J A, Moore C W. Religious intensity, evangelical christianity, and business ethics: An empirical study[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2004, 55(4): 373-386.
  • 2Quinn J J. Personal ethics and business ethics: The ethical attitudes 6f owner/managers of small business[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 1997, 16 (2) : 119-127.
  • 3Chin M K, Hambrick D C, Trevino L K. Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives' values on corporate social responsibility[J]. Ad- ministrative Science Quarterly, 2013, 58 : 197-232.
  • 4孙孝科.企业家的社会责任:不是什么与是什么[J].伦理学研究,2011(1):101-104. 被引量:7
  • 5Strauss A L, Corbin J M. Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory[M]. Thousand Oaks : Sage publi- cations, 2014.
  • 6罗中枢.论信、信念、信仰、宗教信仰的特征及意义[J].宗教学研究,2007(2):128-131. 被引量:26
  • 7唐志龙.当代中国价值观的冲突及其调适[J].南京政治学院学报,2004,20(1):13-15. 被引量:9
  • 8Brickley J A, Smith C W, Zimmerman J L. Manageri- al economics and organizational architecture[M]. Chi- cago: Irwin, 1997.
  • 9陈兵.晚唐以来的三教合一思潮及其现代意义[J].四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007,34(4):38-45. 被引量:17
  • 10鲁湘子.略论儒释道三教合一的内在因素.社会科学研究,2000,(6):81-83.

二级参考文献249

共引文献1051

同被引文献98

引证文献5

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部