摘要
目的了解Cardiff痤疮伤残指数(CADI)和面部痤疮特异性生活质量调查问卷(Qol-acne)两种痤疮量表在国内临床的适用性。方法在知情同意的前提下,应用两量表对66例面部痤疮患者进行生存质量的调查,并分析两量表的信度、效度,并对两量表的得分进行相关分析。结果两量表的信度、效度均较好。两量表得分呈负相关(γ=-0.854,P<0.001),即CADI得分越高Qol-acne得分越低。结论两量表均具有较好的信度及效度,能作为我国面部痤疮患者生活质量的测评工具。临床医师可以根据实际情况选择合适的量表对面部痤疮患者进行生活质量的评估。
Objective In order to evaluate the applicability of the cardiff acne disability index（CADI） and the quality of life among patients with facial acne（Qol-acne） in China. Methods With the informed consent, 66 facial acne patients were investigated with CADI and Qol-acne, analyzing the reliability and validity of the two forms. And a correlation analysis with the scores of the two scales was also made. Results The two life forms both have good reliability and validity. And their scores were negative correlated. The score of CADI was higher, while the Qol-acne＇s score was lower. Conclusion Both of the two forms have good reliability and validity, and they could be used to evaluate the quality of life for facial acne patients in China. Clinicians could choose suitable form to evaluate the life quality of facial acne patients.
出处
《中国中西医结合皮肤性病学杂志》
CAS
2016年第2期108-110,共3页
Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
关键词
面部痤疮
生活质量
信度
效度
Fical acne
Quality of life
Reliability
Validity
