期刊文献+

几种提取转基因木瓜DNA方法的比较 被引量:2

Comparison of several methods for extracting DNA from transgenic papaya
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较CTAB法、SDS法及试剂盒法分别提取木瓜果皮、果肉、种籽DNA的效果,以提高转基因木瓜的检测准确率。方法对转基因木瓜内源基因Papain及外源基因NPTII、CP进行普通PCR,同时对基因表达零件Ca MV35S启动子和NOS终止子进行荧光PCR,以检测提取DNA的质量。结果分析电泳产物发现,SDS法提取木瓜种籽样品的DNA未能适合普通PCR检测的要求,其他方法均能满足普通PCR要求。荧光PCR结果显示,3种方法提取的DNA都满足荧光扩增要求。结论比较3种提取方法及3种木瓜材料,发现用CTAB法或SDS法以果皮为材料提取DNA质量最佳。 Objective Comparison of several methods for extracting DNA from pericarp, pulp and seed of papaya using CTAB method, SDS method and kit method, so as to improve the detection accuracy of transgenic papaya. Methods Papaya species-specific Papain gene and exogenous gene of NPTII and CP were detected by common PCR, meanwhile Ca MV35 S promoter and NOS terminator were detected by fluorescent PCR, in order to detect the quality of extracted DNA. Results By analyzing the electrophoresis products, extraction of papaya seeds' DNA by SDS method was failed to fit the requirements of common PCR detection except other else. The results of fluorescent PCR detection demonstrated that DNA from 3 kinds of papaya materials extracted by 3 kinds of methods all had typical fluorescence amplification curves. Conclusion Compared 3 kinds of extraction methods and 3 kinds of papaya material, CTAB method or SDS method and extracting pericarp DNA had the best quality of extracted DNA.
出处 《食品安全质量检测学报》 CAS 2016年第4期1531-1534,共4页 Journal of Food Safety and Quality
关键词 木瓜 CTAB法 SDS法 试剂盒法 DNA提取 荧光PCR papaya CTAB method SDS method kit method DNA extraction real-time PCR
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献45

  • 1李来好,郝志明,吴燕燕.基因食品的营养安全问题[J].现代食品科技,2005,21(2):166-170. 被引量:2
  • 2邓鸿铃,郭新东,吴玉銮.利用PCR方法检测转BT基因水稻[J].现代食品科技,2007,23(4):71-74. 被引量:17
  • 3贾士荣.转基因植物食品中标记基因的安全性评价[J].中国农业科学,1997,30(2):1-15. 被引量:140
  • 4Fitch MMM, Manshardt RM, Gonsalves D, et al. Stable Wansformation of papaya via microp mjectile bombardment [J]. Plant Cell Reports, 1990 (9): 189-194.
  • 5Cheng YH, Yang JS, Yeh SD. Efficient transformation ofpapaya by coat protein gene of papaya ringspot virus mediated by Agrobacterium following liquid-phase wounding of embryogenic tissues with caborundum [J]. Plant Cell Reports, 1996 (16): 127-132.
  • 6Gonsalves C, Cai W, Tennant P, Gonsalves D. Effective development of papaya ringspot virus resistant papaya with untranslatable coat protein gene using a modified microp rojectile Wansformation method [J]. ISHS Acta Horticulturae, 1998 (461): 311-314.
  • 7Lines R E, Persley D, Dale J L, Drew R, Bateson M F. Genetically engineered immunity to papaya ringspot virus in Australian papaya cullivars [J]. Molecular Breeding, 2002 (10): 119-129.
  • 8Bau HJ, Cheng YH, Yu TA, Yang JS, Yeh SD. Broad-spectrum resistance to different geographic swains of papaya ringspot virus in coat protein gene transgenic papaya [J]. Phytopathology, 2003 (93): 112-120.
  • 9Magdalita PM, Laurena AC, Yabut-Perez BM, Botella JR, et al. Progress in the development oflransgenic papaya: transformation of solo papaya using ACC synthase antisense construct [J]. ISHS Acta Horticulturae, 2002 (575): 171-176.
  • 10Wall EM, Lawrence TS, Green MJ, Rott ME. Detection and identification of transgenic virus resistant papaya and squash by multiplex PCR [J]. European Food Research and Technology, 2004 (219): 90-96.

共引文献36

同被引文献30

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部