摘要
以成都市活水公园、浣花溪公园、凤凰湖湿地公园的滨水植物景观为研究对象,选取了25个植物景观单元,综合运用AHP法、SBE法、BIB-LCJ法、SD法对其现状进行了评价,对4种评价方法的结果进行了相关性分析,建立了SBE法和SD法之间的综合评价模型。结果表明,4种方法对滨水植物景观的评价结果一致性较高,而人们对滨水植物景观美感度的心理感受强度与水的生态性、植物景观与整体环境的协调性、空间序列、水岸景观以及抗干扰能力密切相关。对比综合评价模型和AHP法因子评价结果可知,专业设计者和公众都认为水的生态性、植物景观与整体环境的协调性、抗干扰能力对于城市公园滨水植物景观的品质有显著影响,对于空间序列和水岸景观两项要素,两者间审美态度存在差异。
Twenty five plantscape units in Living Water Park,Huanhuaxi Park and Phoenix Lake Wetland Park in Chengdu were chosen as study objects.AHP,SBE,BIB-LCJ and SD were comprehensively used to evaluate the current situation of waterfront plant landscape in the 3parks.Also,The correlation between any 2 methods were discussed.Furthermore,the comprehensive evaluation model between SBE and SD was established.The results showed that the consistency of the evaluation results of the 4 methods was relatively high.People＇s psychological perception intensity on the aesthetic value of waterfront plantscape was closely influenced by the quality of water,the harmony between plantscape and the environment,space sequence,coastline landscape style and the anti-interference ability.The comparison between SBE-SD comprehensive model and AHP showed that,both the designers and general public hold the opinion that the quality of water,the harmony between plantscape and the environment and the anti-interference ability had significant influence on the quality of waterfront plantscape of urban park.However,there were aesthetic differences between designers and general public on space sequence and coastline landscape style.
出处
《西北林学院学报》
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第3期291-297,共7页
Journal of Northwest Forestry University
基金
国家自然科学基金(31400195)
