期刊文献+

肾部分切除术与肾癌根治术治疗T1b期肾癌疗效的Meta分析 被引量:12

Partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for T1b renal carcinoma:a Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比肾部分切除术与肾癌根治术治疗T1b期肾癌的疗效。方法计算机检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library和ISI Web of Knowledge,查找2015年8月前所有对比肾部分切除术与肾癌根治术治疗T1b期肾癌的临床试验,同时筛检纳入文献的参考文献,提取数据后采用Stata软件对数据结果进行Meta分析。结果共纳入10篇回顾性对照试验,18 183例患者。5年及10年总体生存率的风险比不具有统计学差异(P>0.05),两种手术方式总体生存率无明显统计学差异;5年及10年肿瘤特异性生存率的风险比具有统计学差异(P<0.05),肾部分切除术具有更高的肿瘤特异生存率和局部复发风险。结论 T1b期肾癌行肾部分切除术虽具有较高的局部复发风险,但总体特异性生存率与肾癌根治术无明显统计学差异,在技术条件允许的条件下肾部分切除术可成为T1b的首选术式。 Objective To compare the oncologic outcomes and efficacy of partial nephrectomy(PN)and radical nephrectomy(RN)for T1b renal carcinoma.Methods Databases including PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Library and ISI Web of Knowledge were systematically searched for clinical studies comparing PN and RN for T1b renal carcinoma published before August,2015.Data collected were analyzed with stata software.Results According to predefined inclusion criteria,10 studies involving 18 183 patients were enrolled.There was no significant difference between the PN group and RN group regarding the 5-year and10-year overall survival(OS)(P〈0.05).However,the PN group had higher 5-year and10-year cancer specific survival(CSS)(P〈0.05).PN group had higher local recurrence rate and lower distant metastasis rate.Conclusion Our analysis indicates that PN has the same overall specific survival as RN for T1b renal carcinoma despite of higher local recurrence rate.PN may become the preferred operation method for T1b renal carcinoma in some cases.
出处 《现代泌尿外科杂志》 CAS 2016年第5期367-371,共5页 Journal of Modern Urology
关键词 肾部分切除术 肾癌根治术 T1b期肾癌 META分析 partial nephrectomy radical nephrectomy T1b renal carcinoma Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1赵振威,李延江.肾细胞癌流行病学的研究进展[J].山东医药,2013,53(7):95-97. 被引量:47
  • 2RINI B I, CAMPBELL S C, ESCUDIER B.Renal cell carcinoma [J].Lancet,2009,373(9669):1119-1132.
  • 3PATARD J J, SHVARTS O, LAM J S, et al.Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience [J].J Urol,2004,171(6 Pt 1):2181-2185.
  • 4ZINI L, PERROTTE P, CAPITANIO U, et al.Radical versus partial nephrectomy: effect on overall and noncancer mortality [J].Cancer,2009,115(7):1465-1471.
  • 5ANTONELLI A, FICARRA V, BERTINI R, et al.Elective partial nephrectomy is equivalent to radical nephrectomy in patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma: results of a retrospective, comparative, multi-institutional study [J].BJU Int,2012,109(7):1013-1018.
  • 6BADALATO G M, KATES M, WISNIVESKY J P, et al.Survival after partial and radical nephrectomy for the treatment of stage T1bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the USA: a propensity scoring approach [J].BJU Int,2012,109(10):1457-1462.
  • 7CREPEL M, JELDRES C, PERROTTE P, et al.Nephron-sparing surgery is equally effective to radical nephrectomy for T1BN0M0 renal cell carcinoma: a population-based assessment [J].Urology,2010,75(2):271-275.
  • 8IIZUKA J, KONDO T, HASHIMOTO Y, et al.Similar functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy for clinical T1b and T1a renal cell carcinoma [J].Int J Urol,2012,19(11):980-986.
  • 9KIM J M, SONG P H, KIM H T, et al.Comparison of Partial and Radical Nephrectomy for pT1b Renal Cell Carcinoma [J].Korean J Urol,2010,51(9):596-600.
  • 10LEIBOVICH B C, BLUTE M, CHEVILLE J C, et al.Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy [J].J Urol,2004,171(3):1066-1070.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Pantuck A J, Zisman A, Belldegrun AS, et al. The changing natu- ral history of renal cell carcinoma[ J ]. J Urology, 2001,166 (5) : 1611-1623.
  • 2Stafforda HS, Sahzstein SL, Shimasaki S, et al. Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in renal cell carcinoma incidence and survival [J]. J Urology, 2008,179(5) :1704-1708.
  • 3Aron M, Nguyen MM, Stein P,J, eta/. Impact of gender in renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of the SEER database[ J]. European Urology, 2008,54( 1 ) :133-142.
  • 4Hu J, Ugnat AM. Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Re- search Group. Active and passive smoking and risk of renalcellcar- cinoma in Canada[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2005,41 (5) :770-778.
  • 5Parker AS, Cerhan JR, Janney CA, et al. Smoking cessation and renal cell carcinoma [ J ]. Ann Epidemiol, 2003,13 ( 4 ) :245-251.
  • 6Colli JL, Busby JE, Amling CL. Renal cell carcinoma rates com- pared with gealth status and behavior in the United States[ J]. J U- rology, 2009,73 (2) :431-436.
  • 7Hu J, Chen Y, Mao Y, et al. Alcohol drinking and renal cell car- inoma in Canadian men and women [ J ]. Cancer Detect Prey, 2008,32( 1 ) :7-14.
  • 8Mellcmgaard A, McLaughlin JK, Overvad K, et al. Dietary risk factors for renal cell carcinoma in Denmark[ J]. European J Canc- er, 1996,32A(4) :673-682.
  • 9Grieb SM, Theis RP, Burr D, et al. Food groups and renal cell carcinoma: results from a case-control study[ J]. J Am Dietet As- soc, 2009,109(4) :656-667.
  • 10Miller DC, Ruterbusch J, Colt JS, et al. Contemporary clinical ep- idemiology of renal cell carcinoma: insight from a population based case-control study[ J]. J Urology, 2010,184 (6) :2254-2258.

共引文献46

同被引文献84

引证文献12

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部