期刊文献+

超声定位舌骨测量舌颏距离预测困难气道的价值 被引量:7

Value of hyomental distance measured when the hyoid is located using ultrasound in predicting difficult airway
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价超声定位舌骨测量舌颏距离预测困难气道的价值.方法 拟于气管插管全麻下行择期手术患者213例,年龄18~64岁,性别不限,BMI 14~ 34 kg/m2,张口度>3 cm,寰椎关节伸展度>90°,Mallampati分级Ⅰ~Ⅳ级,ASA分级Ⅰ~Ⅲ级.麻醉前进行人工定位舌骨手指估测舌颏距离(HMDf)、人工定位舌骨刻度尺测量舌颏距离(HMDr)以及超声定位舌骨测量舌颏距离(HMDu).麻醉诱导后,直接喉镜下Cormack-Lehane分级3或4级定义为困难气道.以超声定位舌骨为标准,计算人工定位舌骨的错误率;应用Youden指数确定预测困难气道的最佳值,以此标准计算HMDf、HMDr和HMDu预测困难气道的灵敏度和特异度.结果 人工定位舌骨的错误率为18.8%.HMDu预测困难气道的灵敏度为64.6%、特异度为91.5%;HMDr预测困难气道的灵敏度为62.5%、特异度为84.8%;HMDf预测困难气道的灵敏度为29.2%、特异度为98.2%.结论 超声定位舌骨测量舌颏距离可准确地预测困难气道. Objective To evaluate the value of hyomental distance (HMD) measured when the byoid was located using ultrasound in predicting the difficult airway.Methods Two hundred and thirteen patients of both sexes,aged 18-64 yr,with body mass index of 14-34 kg/m2,with interincisor distance 〉3 cm,with atlanto-axial joint mobility 〉 90°,of Mallampati class Ⅰ-Ⅳ,of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ-Ⅲ,scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia,were enrolled in the study.The HMD was measured by fingers (finger breaths in width,HMDf) and by rulers (HMDr) when the hyoid was located artificially and when the hyoid was viewed on ultrasound (HMDu) before anesthesia induction.After anesthesia induction,the difficult airway was defined as Cormack-Lehane grade 3 or 4 assessed under direct laryngoscope during intubation.The hyoid viewed on ultrasound was considered as the criterion,and the error rate was calculated when the hyoid was located artificially.Youden Index was used to determine the optimal value in predicting difficult airway,and the specificity and sensitivity of HMDf,HMDr and HMDu in predicting difficult airway were calculated based on this criterion.Results The error rate was 18.8% when the hyoid was located artificially.The specificity and sensitivity of HMDu in predicting difficult airway were 64.6% and 91.5%,respectively.The specificity and sensitivity of HMDr in predicting difficult airway were 62.5% and 84.8%,respectively.The specificity and sensitivity of HMDf in predicting difficult airway was 29.2% and 98.2%,respectively.Conclusion The HMD measured when the hyoid is located using ultrasound can accurately predict the difficult airway.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期328-331,共4页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
关键词 超声检查 舌骨 插管法 气管内 预测 Ultrasonography Hyoid bone Chin Intubation,intratracheal Forecasting
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Cook TM, MacDougall-Davis SR. Complications and failure of airway management[ J]. Br J Anaesth, 2012, 109 Suppl 1 : i68- i85 .DOI : 10.1093/bja/aes393.
  • 2Langeron O, Cuvillon P, Ibanez-Esteve C, et al. Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation : time for a paradigm change [ J ]. An- esthesiology, 2012,117 ( 6 ) : 1223-1253. DOI: 10.1097/ALN. 0b0- 13e31827537cb,.
  • 3Takenaka I, Iwagaki T, Aoyama K, et al. Preoperative evalua- tion of extension capacity of the occipitoatlantoaxial complex in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison between the Bell- house test and a new method, hyomental distance ratio[ J]. An- esthesiology, 2006,104(4) :680-685.
  • 4Etezadi F, Ahangari A, Shokri H, et al. Thyromental height: a new clinical test for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2013,117 (6) : 1347-1351. DOI: 10. 1213lANE. 0b013c3182a8c734.
  • 5Reed MJ, Dunn M J, McKeown DW. Can an airway assessment score predict difficulty at intubation in the emergency depart- ment? [ J]. Emerg Med J ,2005,22(2) :99-102.
  • 6Mahmoodpoor A, Soleimanpour H, Nia KS, et al. Sensitivity of palm print, modified mallampati score and 3-3-2 rule in pre- diction of difficult intubation [ J ]. Int J Prev Med, 2013,4 ( 9 ) : 1063-1069.
  • 7Yu T, Wang B, Jin XJ, et al. Predicting difficult airways: 3- 3-2 rule or 3-3 rule[ J]. Ir J Med Sci,2015,184(3) :677-683. DOI : 10. lO07/sl 1845-015-1276-7.
  • 8Aslani A, Ng SC, Hurley M, et al. Accuracy of identification of the ericothyroid membrane in female subjects using palpation: an observational study [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2012, 114 ( 5 ) : 987- 992.DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0bO13e31824970ba.
  • 9Elliott DS, Baker PA, Scott MR, et al. Accuracy of surface landmark identification for cannula cricothyroidotomy[ J]. Anaes- thesia, 2010,65 ( 9 ) : 889-894. DOI : 10.1111/j. 1365-2044. 2010. 06425.x.
  • 10Prasad A, Yu E, Wong DT, et al. Comparison of sonography and computed tomography as imaging tools for assessment of air- way structures[J]. J Ultrasound Med,2011,30(7) :965-972.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Carroll MT,Mirakhur RK,Lowry DW,et al.Neuromuscular blocking effects and train-of-four fade with cisatracurium:comparison with other nondepolarising relaxants[J].Anaesthesia,1998,53(12):1169-1173.
  • 2Wierda JMKH,Hommes FDM,Nap HJA,et al.Comparison of the time course of action and endotracheal intubating conditions of vecuronium bromide rocuronium bromide and mivacurium chloride[J].Anaesthesia,1995,50 (5):393-396.
  • 3Cheng CA,Aun CS,Gin T.Comparison of rocuronium and suxamethonium for rapid tracheal intubation in children[J].Paediatr Anaesth,2002,12(2):140-145.
  • 4Crul JF,Vanbelleghem V,Buyse L,et al.Rocuronium wih afentanyl and propofol allows intubation within 45 seconds[J].Eur J Anaesth,1995,12(11):111-112.
  • 5Booij LHDJ,Crul JF.A comparision vecuronium with the hypothetic ideal neuromuscular blocking drug[J].Excerpta Medica Amesterdam,1983,3(2):105-108.
  • 6Alvarez JA.Rocuronium[J].Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim.1997,44(1):3-5.
  • 7Hans P,Brichant JF,Franze A,et al.Comparison of neuromuscular block of atracurium and rocuronium in adults[J].Acta Anaesthesiolo Belg,1996,47(2):53-58.
  • 8田鸣,邓晓明,朱也森,左明章,李士通,吴新民.困难气道管理专家共识[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2009,25(3):200-203. 被引量:174

共引文献270

同被引文献36

引证文献7

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部