摘要
目的探讨PVP和PKP治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折的疗效。方法 60例骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折的患者按入院顺序分为30例研究组(接受PKP治疗)和30例对照组(接受PVP治疗)。结果研究组手术时间明显长于对照组(P<0.05);研究组和对照组手术后椎体前缘高度、椎体中间高度、Cobb角结果比较有差异(P<0.05)。结论本次研究认为PVP和PKP均能改善骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩骨折患者的疼痛程度,但PKP对改善椎体前缘高度、椎体中间高度、Cobb角明显优于PVP治疗方法。
Objective To explore the effects of PVP and PKP treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fracture. Methods 60 cases of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fracture patients according to the admission order were divided into 30 cases in the study group （receiving PKP treatment） and 30 cases in the control group （receiving PVP treatment）. Results The operative time of study group was significantly longer than the control group （P〈0.05）; there were differences in postoperative anterior vertebral height, middle vertebral height, Cobb angle results between study group and control group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion This study suggests that PVP and PKP both can relieve pain of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fracture patients, but PKP was significantly better than PVP at improving vertebral height, middle vertebral height and Cobb angle.
出处
《中国医药指南》
2016年第15期122-123,共2页
Guide of China Medicine
