不同任务认知复杂度对英语学习者书面语言表现的影响研究被引量：4

A Study on the Influence of Different Cognitive Complexity of Tasks on EFL Learners' Written Language Performance

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文基于"认知假设模型"与"有限注意力资源模型",要求40名英语学习者分别完成两篇不同认知复杂度的议论文写作任务,来探讨不同认知复杂度对英语学习者书面语言表现的影响。语言表现主要体现在语言流利度、准确度及复杂度三个方面。本研究通过控制涉及因素、推理要求、准备时间及背景知识四个变量,得到如下结论:随着认知复杂度的提高,英语学习者的语言流利度有所提高,但并不显著;语言准确度及词汇复杂度显著性下降;而句法复杂度有一定程度的下降。 Based on Cognitive Hypothesis model and Limited Attentional Capacity model,the study asks 40 English learners to finish two argumentative writing texts with different coqnitive complexity respectively,with the aim to investigate the effects of different cognitive complexity of argumentative writing tasks on the written language performance in terms of language fluency,accuracy and complexity.By manipulating four variables,that is,＋/- elements,＋/- reasoning,＋/- planning time and ＋/- background information,the study gets the results that with the in crease of cognitive comprexity,fluency increases in an insignificant way,accuracy and lexical complrexity decrease significantly,and syntactic complexity decreases to some degree.

作者李珍刘雪莲

机构地区大连外国语大学

出处《语言教育》 2016年第2期31-36,共6页 Language Education

关键词认知复杂度写作任务议论文写作语言表现 cognitive complexity argumentative writing language performance

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献3

1何莲珍,王敏.任务复杂度、任务难度及语言水平对中国学生语言表达准确度的影响[J].现代外语,2003,26(2):171-179. 被引量：102
2王静萍.资源指引型的任务复杂度对二语写作语言表现的影响[J].外语教学,2013,34(4):65-68. 被引量：32
3闫嵘,张磊.任务复杂度、任务难度和自我效能感对外语写作的影响[J].外语界,2015(1):40-47. 被引量：34

二级参考文献74

1陈慧媛,吴旭东.任务难度与任务条件对EFL写作的影响[J].现代外语,1998,21(2). 被引量：103
2Robinson, P. & S. Ross. 1996. The development of task-based testing in English for Academic Purposes programs [J]. Applied Linguistics, 17: 523-49.
3Schneider, W. & R. Shiffrin. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: Detection, search and attention [J]. Psychological Review, 84:1-66.
4Skehan, P. 1994. Second language acquisition strategies, interlanguage development and task-based learning[A] . In M. Bygate, A. Tonkyn and E. Williams (eds.). Grammar and the Language Teacher [C]. New York: Prentice Hall.
5Skehan, P. 1998. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6Skehan, P. & P. Foster. 1999. The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings [J]. Language Learning, 49: 93-129.
7Spada, N. & P. Lighthown. 1993. Instruction and the development of question in the L,2 classroom[J] . Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 15:205-221.
8Stevick, W. E. 1999. Affect in learning and memory: From alchemy to chemistry[A]. In J. Arnold (eds.). Affect in Language Learning [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensive output in its development [A]. In S. Gass & C. Madden (eds.). Input in Second Language Acquisition [C]. Rowley, MA: Newburv House.
10VanPatten, B. 1990. Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12:287-301.