期刊文献+

经典的价值——“大学通识教育联盟”四校的传统文化课程评析 被引量:11

Value of Classics:Chinese Traditional Culture Curriculum Review of University General Education Alliance
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章以"大学通识教育联盟"为例,考察北京大学、清华大学、复旦大学和中山大学的通识教育改革举措,比较和分析各校传统文化课程设置特点。研究显示:四校文史课程充足,但模块内课程量差异较大;授课内容较集中,部分学校课容量偏大,本科生修课总量过重;传统文化作为隐性课程,具有较大的发展空间。为了有效提升大学生的传统文化素养,建议将传统文化定为通识教育核心课程,作为本科共同基础课程;将"经史相合"的理念融入传统文化课程建设中,发挥经典核心课程的作用;采用阅读、讲授与讨论相结合的教学方式,开发和整合教学资源,完善通识课程体系,培养大学生的民族认同和文化认同,凝聚共同的核心价值观。 Taking the "University General Education Alliance" as a study object, the article reviews general education reforms of Peking University, Tsinghua University, Fudan University and Sun Yat-sen University. Comparison and study of the characteristics of Chinese traditional culture curriculum in these four universities shows: they all boast adequate Chinese traditional culture courses in humanities, but differ in course arrangement; most courses use similar topics and teaching methods and have large classes and overload credits demands for undergraduates; traditional culture curriculum has large potential as hidden curriculum. To improve cultural qualities of Chinese university students, firstly, we need to make Chinese traditional culture curriculum the core curriculum in general education and a basic requirement for undergraduates. Secondly, we need to bring the idea of "integration of theory and history" into curriculum arrangement and make sure the core curriculum plays a substantial role. Thirdly, we need to involve reading, lecturing and discussing in teaching, explore and integrate education resources, and improve general curriculum system, so as to help college students foster a sense of national and cultural identity and share a common core value.
作者 张亚群 冯寅
出处 《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期148-155,160,共9页 Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金"十一五"规划教育学一般课题"中国近代大学通识教育与创新人才培养"(BAA100015)
关键词 大学通识教育联盟 “四校” 传统文化 经典 核心课程 University General Education Alliance "four universities" traditional culture classics core curriculum
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1约瑟夫.斯科特.李,张亚群,蔡培瑜.大学院校中的核心文本--柏拉图的《斐德罗篇》与孔子的《论语》[J].大学教育科学,2014(1):91-99. 被引量:3
  • 2教育部.关于加强大学生文化素质教育的若干意见(教高司[1998]2号)[EB/OL].http://www.chinalawedu.corn/news/1200/22598/22615/22796/2006/3/qi65515213026136002347 5-0.htm. 1998-04-10 .
  • 3教育部.完善中华优秀传统文化教育指导纲要(教社科[2014]3号)[N].中国教育报,2014-04-02(3).
  • 4关海庭、宋鑫、何山.构建以素质教育为取向的跨学科通选课程体系[A].台湾交通大学通识教育委员会编.“自由学艺与传统:通过东西方核心经典作品研读来深入对话与体现制度”学术研讨会论文集[C].台湾新竹,2008-11:77-78.
  • 5张亚群.作为通识课程的核心文本教学[N].厦门大学报,2014-06-30(1).
  • 6孙向晨.直面经典--复旦大学通识教育中“哲学经典”课程的建设和教学的探索[A].台湾交通大学通识教育委员会编.“自由学艺与传统:通过东西方核心经典作品研读来深入对话与体现制度”学术研讨会论文集[C].台湾新竹,2008-11:71.
  • 7甘阳.大学通识教育的纲与目[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2007,18(2):1-6. 被引量:64
  • 8刘易斯.失去灵魂的卓越一哈佛是如何忘记教育宗旨的[M].侯定凯译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2007-44.
  • 9刘家和.史学和经学[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1985(3):1-11. 被引量:12
  • 10柳诒徵."出版者的话"[A].中国文化史[C].上海:东方出版中心.2007.

二级参考文献8

  • 1[3]Richard Hersh and John Merrow,eds.,Declining by Degrees:Higher Education at Risk.New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2005.
  • 2[4]James Fallows,"College admissions:a substitute for quality?",Declining by Degrees:Higher Education at Risk,ch.3.
  • 3[1]Jay Mathews,"Caveat lector:unexamined assumptions about quality in higher education",Declining by Degrees:Higher Education at Risk,ch.4.
  • 4[2]Murray Sperber,"How undergraduate education became college lite",Declining by Degrees:Higher Education at Risk,ch.9.
  • 5[3]Howard Gardner,"Beyond markets and individuals:a focus on educational goals";and David L.Kirp,"This littie student went to market",Declining by Degrees:Higher Education at Risk,ch.7 and 8.
  • 6[4]Harry R.Lewis,Excellence Without a Soul:How a Great University Forgot Education,New York:Public Affairs,2006.
  • 7台湾大学“通识”课程[EB/OL].台湾大学“通识”课程网,http://nol.ntu.edu.tw/nol/guest/index.php.
  • 8台湾宜兰大学“通识”课程[EB/OL].台湾宜兰大学“通识”课程网,http://www.champ.org.tw/index.htm.

共引文献126

同被引文献111

引证文献11

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部